My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL30618
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL30618
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:48:07 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:45:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981033
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
9/18/1985
Doc Name
PROPOSED DECISION AND FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE FOR PR
From
Mines No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3
Permit Index Doc Type
FINDINGS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-51- <br />XIV. Fish and Wildlife - Rules 2.04.11, 2.05.6(2), and 4.18 <br />The Fish and Wildlife Resources section, and Fish and Wildlife Management Plan <br />have been reviewed by the Division. The Fish and Wildlife sections can be <br />found on page 56 of the Bear No. 1 and No. 2 portion of the application and <br />pages 2.04-44 - 2.04-51, 2.05-49 through 2.05-54 of the Bear No. 3 portion of <br />the application. <br />In a letter of November 19, 1980, the Division of Wildlife indicated the <br />primary impacts from mining along the North Fork of the Gunnison are increased <br />traffic which results in roadkilgs and disturbance to deer and elk migration, <br />and emission of toxic substances into the river - degrading the North Fork <br />fishery (see letter from Rick Sherman of DOW to LeRoy Black of Ute <br />Engineering, Exhibit 10 of the revision application). <br />All disturbed runoff from the surface facilities area at the Bear nine will be <br />routed through a sediment pond and discharges will meet the effluent <br />limitations of Rule 4.05.2, minimizing the deleterious effects of mining on <br />the water quality of the North Fork. Regrading has been completed but <br />topsoiling will be completed and reseeding accomplished at the Bear No. 1 and <br />No. 2 during the fall of 1985. A stream buffer zone has been established and <br />maintained to protect existing streamside vegetation at the Bear No. 3 mine. <br />There are no ponds containing hazardous concentrations of toxic-forming <br />materials on the permit area. The application does not propose the use of <br />persistent pesticides on the area during surface mining and reclamation <br />operations. <br />Production at the Bear Mine will remain at existing levels. Traffic on <br />Highway 133 will not be significantly increased as a result of operations at <br />the mine. <br />DOW noted that the northern bald eagle is the only rare or endangered wildlife <br />species inhabiting the general area, and is a winter resident in the North <br />Fork Valley. Electric transmission and distribution lines within the permit <br />have been constructed to the specifications of Rule 4.18, to ensure the <br />protection of large raptors (see Figure 4, page 2.05-20 of the Bear No. 3 <br />application). <br />Prior to original permit issuance, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has <br />reported the existence of a golden eagle nest in the cliffs above the <br />Bear No. 3 portal. In compliance with original Stipulation No. 7, the <br />permittee conducted a survey and determined that the nest was not active in <br />1982. It was determined that no mitigation plan was warranted. <br />Pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(n), and on the basis of available information, the <br />Division finds that the proposed activities will not affect the continued <br />existence of endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or <br />adverse modification of their critical habitats. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.