My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL30586
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL30586
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:48:05 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:45:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977410
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
11/11/1993
Doc Name
LETTER OF 10/20/93 BOULDER MILL
From
DMG
To
HENDRICKS MINING
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX:1303)8}2-8106 <br />November 11, 1993 <br />Mr. Thomas S. Hendricks <br />Hendricks Mining Co., Inc. <br />P.O. Box 653-Caribou <br />Nederland, CO 80466-0653 <br />RE: Your letter of October 20, 1993, Boulder Mill. <br />Dear Mr. Hendricks: <br />OF'~~(O <br />tide <br />M <br />~,g~. <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />Michael B Lonb <br />Division Direuo~ <br />The Division of Minerals and Geology has reviewed your letter <br />requesting what would be required to permit the Boulder Mill <br />facility and what size reclamation bond would have to bey posted. <br />It is hard to say what size reclamation bond would be required <br />since a detailed operation and reclamation plan is necessary before <br />the Division can evaluate, on a task by task basis, the reclamation <br />required and thus the size of the bond. I can be somewhat more <br />definitive about what would be required to permit this oF~eration. <br />Administratively, the area would have to be permitted ais a new <br />operation under the new provisions of the Mined Land Reclamation <br />Act pertaining to designated mining operations. I have enclosed a <br />copy of the recently changed Act and a summary sheet of the recent <br />changes. Please especially note the environmental protection plan <br />requirements. <br />I will list some of the things the Division takes in to account <br />when permitting sites such as this: <br />Location of the site and its geologic and hydrologic <br />conditions. This would include detailed analyses of any <br />formerly deposited tailings material(s) that wr~uld be <br />disturbed by the proposed operation. This would also include <br />detailed baseline analyses. <br />Nature of the ore being shipped to the site. we understand <br />that the ore has a more complicated mineralogy than indicated <br />in your letter. We would anticipate finding other base metal <br />sulfides upon detailed analysis. At a minimum, the Division <br />would require 3rd party sampling of the ore for use in a <br />mineralogical analysis. Such analysis should include <br />transmitted light and reflected light microscopy to .identify <br />~ F III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />STATE OF COLC>RADO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.