My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL30527
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL30527
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:48:03 PM
Creation date
11/23/2007 6:44:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1976020
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
8/14/1996
Doc Name
MEMO-MEETING WITH GEOF SCHLITTGEN AND RICH MAYO ON 8-13-96
From
DMG
To
FILE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Geof Schlittgen • <br />10007 County Road 250 <br />Durango, Colorado 81301 <br />Mr. John N. Reese <br />District Engineer <br />U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br />1325 J Street <br />Sacramento, Ca. 95814-2922 <br />Re: Public Notice #199475260 <br />Dear Mr. Reese, <br />pENVE:R <br />OFFIGE <br />R2Ce1V2d <br />r <br />AUG 3 ~~ 'j~~`, <br />purnrv~o F~~~?d ~Ntio <br />@O;tsL~n 6t ,.tiw~'.. a C3aao9Y <br />I am responding to the above referenced notices as a concerned adjacent property <br />owner to the Mountain Redi PAix operation. Having lived and been a property owner in <br />the vicinity of the above referenced operation since April of 1978, I have witn~;ssed first <br />hand the results of the mining activities. But before getting into the body of my <br />observations and complaints I would first like to make it known that I am concerned <br />about the thoroughness of the notifications, particularly to those of us specifically <br />impacted by the operations. Although I made certain that a number of specific names <br />be included on the mailing list for said notifications, I find it irregular and disturbing that <br />a number of us were omitted from the actual mailing. Perhaps, in light of the rnagnitude <br />of these operations and their potential significant impacts, it would be reasonable to <br />extend the response period beyond April 15 to allow those omitted from ttie mailing <br />adequate time to respond. In any case, I do strongly feel that a public hearing should <br />be conducted prior to any decisions as regards the permitting of these operations. <br />My concerns regarding these operations stem initially from the fact that my, as well as <br />my neighbor's, irrigation water rights have been dried up as a direct result of the <br />Mountain Redi Mix, Thomas Pit operations. So much gravel has been extracted from <br />this pit that the river bed and banks in the immediate vicinity and up river out:+ide of the <br />permitted area have dropped significantly, altering the flow of the river from its original <br />natural main and eastern most channels directly into the Thomas Pit. A huge "sink <br />hole" has been formed. There is no way that the quantity of aggregate extracted by this <br />operation alone can be naturally replenished by the river. The "war zone" appearance <br />and huge pits will attest to that fact. This operator has "patched" the river bank just <br />enough to put the flow back into the main channel during the low flow winter months <br />but not enough to withstand the spring run off flours which breach their flimsy dike and <br />then allow the full flow of the river into their deep pit bringing in aggregate from the <br />river bed and banks of the neighbors upstream land for the duration of they summer <br />and fall. <br />My water rights consist of .5 c.f.s. from the Wallace Ditch, priority A3 (3rd filing on the <br />",q..,R TIt^.~_. ~_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.