Laserfiche WebLink
population projections for the period 1990-20I5. Delta County is projected • <br />to have a population of 22,280 by 2015 or a 6.2 percent increase over 1990. <br />Employment for Delta County increased from 7,600 in 1989 to 8,124 in <br />1990 or a 7 percent increase according to data from the Bureau of Economic <br />Analysis. Mining employment was 345 in 1980 and dropped to 98 by 1989, a <br />72 percent decrease. In 1989 mining employment represented one percent of <br />the: counry's employment. Mining earnings were 10.8 million in 1980 and <br />decreased to 4.6 million by 1989. Mining earnings represented 13 percent <br />of non farm earnings in 1980 and 4 percent of non farm earnings in 1989. <br />TABLE 2. POPULATION OF TOWNS IN DELTA COUNTY <br />TOWN 1980 1990 PERCENTAGE CHANCE <br />Cedaredge 1184 1380 +11 <br />Crawford 268 221 -18 <br />Delta 3931 3789 -4 <br />Hotchkiss 855 744 -13 <br />Orchard City 1914 2218 '+16 <br />Paonia 1425 1403 -2 • <br />Housing Vacancy Races for Delta County have decreased from 14.23 in <br />198() to 7.09 in 1988. Vacancy races of less than 10 percent can be <br />indicative of a housi:~g shortage. It should be kept in mind that the rates <br />do riot indicate either physical condition or whether the units are <br />available year around or seasonally. <br />The unemployment rates for Delta County in the middle 1980's were <br />around 10 percent. The rate for 1991 has been around 5.4 percent. This <br />rate indicates that local workers would be available to fill new jobs. <br />A socioeconomic survey of Delta County residents vas conducted in 1981 <br />concerning their perceptions and ideas about energy-related growth; these <br />concerns may still be true. In general, respondents felt that clean air <br />and scenery should not be sacrificed to meet the country's energy needs. <br />Most agreed that the costs of growth related to energy production should <br />not be borne by the residents and chat increased job opportunities were <br />seen as a positive benefit resulting from energy development. Some saw <br />increased crime as a possible adverse effect of energy development. <br />Soils <br />The dominant soils in the subject area are Beenom-Absarokee <br />Association, (20 to 608 slopes), Broad Canyon-Cool-Scout family complex, <br />(S-2:i8 slopes), Haploborolls-Ustochrepcs-Rock outcrop complex (40 Co 998 <br />slopes) and Herm-Fughes complex (5 co 258 slopes). From USDA Soil <br />Conservation Surveys, Paonia Survey, 1981 and Crand Mesa Survey, <br />19 <br />