Laserfiche WebLink
sources of water (US FS eater resources, stock: ponds and intermittent <br />. springs) shown on the '.lest E11: `tine and Reclamation Plan, Map 37. See <br />Table 1 for the adjudicated :rater rights. <br />TABLE 1. ADJUDICATED WATER RIGHTS <br />LAND <br />NAME OF STRUCTURE STATUS SUBDIVISION SEC TWN RNG <br />Hawks Nest Pipeline No. 2 Fee NWSESE 10 13S 90W <br />Hawks Nest Water Supply Fee NWSESE 10 13S 90W <br />Hawks Nest Pipeline No.3 BLM NWNESE 11 135 90W <br />Tony Bear Pipeline - Yuma SPG Fee SESWSW 15 135 90W <br />Tony Bear Pipeline - Wamoum SPC FS SESWNU 22 13S 90W <br />Tony Bear Pipeline - Hogan S?G FS SWSWNW 22 13S 90W <br />Tony Bear Pipeline - ::ig~am S?G FS NWNWSW 22 13S 90W <br />• Ground Water ' <br />The potential .or grourc water occurrence, on the lease tract, exists <br />in both the ::esa~erde =ormat_on and unconsolidated quaternary surface <br />• deposits of col:uvivm/alluvia=. S:ithin the Mesaverde Formation both the <br />Rollins Sands tore and •~arious c:~'_ - -~-ers, depending on secondary <br />porosity, can transmit ground eater. Hc•=~:er, with the geologic dip of the <br />Mesaverde Formation being ro~3hly 3.5 degrees to the north-northeast, <br />ground water recharge could 5e limited to the southern flanks of West <br />Flatiron or from tk:e 2-3 possible faults crossing the lease cract_ <br />The springs are most li<e1y associated with surface Quaternary <br />deposits and/or local fault systems. <br />There are no municipal watersheds or National Resources Waters located <br />on the proposed lease tract. <br />Socioeconomic <br />The proposed lease tract is located in Gunnison County and most of the <br />workers live in Delta County and the mine buys locally as much as <br />possible. These local e:cpenditures by the mine affecC mainly Delta <br />County. Delta Count!, thus, is the focus of the economic impact area <br />analysis. <br />Between <br />population. <br />23,466. The <br />percent over <br />towns :^ Del <br />• <br />1980 and <br />The 1980 <br />1990 ten <br />the 1980 <br />.a County <br />'_99~i, ~e'_:a County experienced changes in its <br />population was 21,225 and the 1985 population was <br />sus puts the population at 20,980, a decrease of one <br />population count. See Table 2 for the population of <br />""~~ -~lorad„ Uivisior. ~' Local Government has made <br />