My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GENERAL30336
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
General Documents
>
GENERAL30336
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:47:54 PM
Creation date
11/22/2007 10:11:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
5/13/2002
Doc Name
MINE PLAN DECISION LETTER TO NEPA COMPLIANCE DOC
Permit Index Doc Type
Other Permits
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 11 - <br />tions. It was verified statistically that the McClane and Hunger respective <br />communities were not significantly different in terms of vegetative productiv- <br />ity within the bounds of each vegetative community. Data from the McClane and <br />Munger sites were combined (within communities and between sites), and it was <br />determined that the combined data met confidence level requirements. <br />Due to the small area of disturbance at the 1icClane site, the CMLRD Sas deter- <br />mined that premine productivity and premine cover data may be applied as rec- <br />lamation success criteria. It was also determined that the productivity data <br />for the reference areas for the McClane Canyon vegetative communities did not <br />meet sample adequacy requirements and required stipulation (see preferred <br />alternative section). - <br />The applicant has not demonstrated that adequate woody plant density sampling <br />has taken place at the McClane Canyon site and required stipulation (see pre- <br />ferred alternative section.) <br />The applicant has proposed a variance from baseline woody plant densities for ' <br />the greasewood shrubland and ihe.sluidscale shrubland, but:~-has not provided <br />justification for the proposed stocking level, and is therefore stipulated <br />:ez;..` (see preferred alternative section). ~-. <br />The permittee has measured species diversity in terms of species richness and <br />species equitability but has not proposed a means to evaluate revegetatian <br />success in terms of species diversity. <br />ClII.RD is concerned with the. ability of Salt Creek Mining Company to reclaim - <br />~" the area given the low annual precipitation and subsequently stipulated it for <br />the compliance. _ <br />• It has determined that no threatened or endangered species of plants exist at <br />the McClane Canyon site, based on information supplied by the applicant. <br />Fish and Wildlife ~ '. - <br />CtiLRD has consulted with Division of Wildlife personnel who are familiar with <br />the area. Both agencies agree that there is little potential for adverse ef- <br />fects of the mine on wildlife since nearly all of the anticipated surface dis- <br />turbance has occurred and a very limited area is affected. <br />Backfilline and Cradi <br />Because the mine is an underground mine, only a limited area of surface dis- <br />turbance will require backfilling and grading. <br />A11 portals and the sediment pond will be backfilled. The coal seam will be <br />completely covered with backfilled material. Drainage will be restored to ap- <br />proximate pre-mining conditions. <br />• If underground development waste is generated during mining it vill~be retain- <br />ed in the mine workings. <br />.: i <br />•. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.