Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Randy Coffman <br />November 2, 1994 <br />Page 2 <br />b. Total depth, screened interval, depth to ground <br />category for each well. <br />c. Laboratory results from the confirmatory soil samples. <br />and usage <br />3. The extent of contamination has not been adequately defined. So~ sample #1, <br />outermost sample from the source, shows contamination present at 20 .9ppm TEH. <br />Additional sampling is necessary to determine extent of contaminati <br />4. You propose to treat the contaminated soil on-site by incorporation in~o the asphalt <br />batch plant. This is an acceptable management of the soil, with prior pproval from <br />the state's Air Pollution Control Division (Jim Geier 303-692-3167). <br />These conclude the Division's comments regarding the Plan. Please re: <br />within 30 days of the receipt of this letter. As we discussed, the Division <br />of $72.47/hr for technical document review. <br />If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact me at 303-692-3437 <br />Sincerely, <br />~~~~ <br />Roger Doak <br />Geologist <br />Solid Waste Section <br />Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division <br />cc: J. Davis, BLM Montrose <br />C. Ohlson, Gunnison County Department of Environmental Health <br />~Ql;f Division of Minerals and Geology <br />F. Schmalz, Schmalz Construction <br />B. Tollefson, BLM Gunnison <br />d, in writing, <br />charge a fee <br />file: SW/GUN/COL lA <br />