REV106859 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• • III IIIIIIIIIIIII III 999 December 20, 1996 aFGE IVEU Mr. Thomas A. Schreiner UE(/ ~.3 X996 Environmental Protection Specialist Division of Minerals and Geology Department of Natural Resources ' ""' " """~'° ~ a ueu~uyy 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 Denver, Colorado 80203 Re: T.H.E. Aggregate Source - Amendment Application Permit No. M-77-193 Dear Mr. Schreiner: Zn response to your December 11, 1996 letter to Rita Everett, and similar communication with Philip B. Smith and Colita N. Smith, requesting clarification of whether our earlier correspoxidence were merely comments or intended to be formal objections to granting of the foregoing permit application, be advised that we are formally objecting to issuance of an amended permit. To clarify, all three of us object to the granting of thE~ application to amend the permit and wish to be formally treated as "Objectors" as long as the permit amendment application is pending before your agency. Specific matters we object to, and intended to object to in the Rita Everett letter dated November 18, 1996 and the Smitki letter dated November 22, 1996, include the following: 1. The storm water management plan (SWMP) that is submitted as part of the application appears to be deficient, or, at least, it is insufficient in content at this point to tell whether or not it is deficient. 2. The proposed haul road plan that is submitted as pax•t of the application appears to be deficient, or, at least, it is insufficient in content at this point to tell whether or not it is deficient. 3. We wish it be made clear that the SWMP, as finally c.esigned and approved, will be wholly constructed and implemented prior to and as a precondition to commencement of operations in tY..e expanded area.