My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-05-20_REVISION - M1977348
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977348
>
2005-05-20_REVISION - M1977348
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:23:47 PM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:37:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977348
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/20/2005
Doc Name
Adequacy Letter
From
DMG
To
Holcim (US) Inc.
Type & Sequence
TR5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID#: M-1977-348 PAGE: 3 <br />INSPECTION DATE: 10-28-04 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: ACS <br />from amendment AM-O1 outline 776 bonded acres, and maps date <br />stamped by DMG on March 22, 1994 show the additional 95 bonded <br />acres. These additional 95 bonded acres are located in quarry <br />E4, where the area covered by bond was extended north to <br />approximately the 117,250N coordinate line by a permit action <br />approved in 1994. <br />3. DMG has examined all of the more than 100 maps included in the <br />permit file. As pointed out by Bill Schenderlein, consultant to <br />Holcim, there are ambiguities in the permit boundary lines on <br />certain maps dated 1992 to present. The ambiguous area lies <br />north of the main cement plant facilities (note that the bulk of <br />the cement plant facilities have never been within the DMG permit <br />area). The definitive permit boundary map was date stamped by DMG <br />on January 19, 1992, during the amendment AM-O1 review period, <br />and is map no. bcc-1356 labeled "PERMIT BOUNDARIES." This map <br />shows that the northernmost of the ambiguous permit boundary <br />lines is the regulatory line. This means that the stacker <br />reclaimer geodesic dome structure is not in the DMG permit <br />boundary. Nor is the quarry office shop (now demolished) or the <br />clinker shed (also demolished). <br />4. On February 13, 2001, DMG received an amendment application from <br />Holcim. This was an application to include the pre-heater <br />building and CKD loading building into the permit area (these <br />buildings have since been demolished). This amendment <br />application was intended to bring the site into compliance with <br />aspects of operations necessary to allow DMG to be the regulatory <br />authority over CKD disposal in the quarry pits. DMG never <br />accepted this amendment application as being officially filed, <br />and when the cement plant shut down in 2002 it was determined <br />that there was no reason to require the amendment. <br />5. The approved reclamation plan does allow roads to be left in the <br />areas to be reclaimed. However, the nature of these roads must <br />be compatible with the poet mining land use of rangeland, meaning <br />that roads that will remain must not be excessively wide, and <br />must not require high frequency maintenance. <br />6. The approved reclamation plan does require that bedrock dip <br />slopes located on the west side of the quarries be revegetated. <br />However, The DMG cannot require revegetation or other reclamation <br />on the pre-law dip slopes in the A-band. Challenges to <br />establishment of vegetation on the post law dip elopes are <br />adhesion of covering fill to the relatively smooth bedrock <br />slopes, and providing an adequate rooting zone above the bedrock <br />surface, which is resistive to root penetration. Ohaervations at <br />the site indicate that the granular gray shale spoil, available <br />in abundance throughout the site, remains stable when placed on <br />the dip elopes (see photo #2 included with this report). Other <br />types of mine spoil stockpiled at the site are also likely to <br />adhere adequately to the bedrock since the slope is only about 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.