My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV105347
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV105347
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:17:00 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:25:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/20/1997
Doc Name
OXBOW CARBON & MINERALS INC SOMERSET & SANBORN CREEK MINES PN C-81-002 FOR TR-29 PHASED MINE EXPANSI
From
TERRAMATRIX MONTGOMERY WATSON MINING GRP
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR29
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />• Fish and Wildlife Resources Information <br />14. Please provide the following information so that we may initiate the U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />consultation process to ensure compliance with 2.04.11 and 4.18: <br />Provide a revised consumptive water use section which includes the anticipated evaporative loss <br />from the proposed refuse pile sediment pond. Also, include any inneases in water consumption <br />which may occur as a result of surface construction, and operations of the facilities proposed with <br />Technical review No. 29. Such increases might result due to increased dust suppression during <br />road and facilities construction, or due to additional water needs for dust suppression or <br />compaction at the proposed refuse pile. Projections of water consumption above the already <br />approved estimate of 85.8 acre feet per year will require additional consultation with the U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service. <br />Provide asite-specific wildlife survey which addresses the potential occurrence ojthreatened and <br />endangered species within the areas proposed for new disturbance. The survey must also include <br />an assessment of the potential impacts~to such species. We enclose a letter from the U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service which lists the potentially impacted species in the area of the mine. Amore <br />detailed survey and impact statement is requested because the November 28, 19951etter from the <br />Colorado Division of Wildlife submitted with Technical Review No. 29 indicates possible <br />impacts to certain protected species. Once the requested report is received, we will forward the <br />materials to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for formal consultation. <br />Response: Bazed on independent calculations az documented in a letter (Attachment B to <br />• this transmittal) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) mine-related depletion <br />from the North Fork of the Gunnison River is acknowledged by the USFWS at a level of <br />93.2cfs. Water meter readings (refer to Attachment B) for the previous four years (9/93 <br />through present) indicate consumptive use rates well below the level calculated by the <br />USFWS. Even with the addition of minor evaporative losses from Pond C az addressed <br />under Response 11 above, anticipated mine water supply withdrawals will not exceed <br />93.2cfs, so no additional USFWS consultation is required. It should be noted that the <br />consumptive use figures presented in TR-29 (page 2.04-53c) represent maximum water use <br />levels for both construction and operating conditions and that the calculated use levels are <br />well above any historical consumptive use to dace. <br />In response to the request for asite-specific wildlife survey for Threatened and Endangered <br />(T&E) Species, TerraMatrix contacted the USFWS (Grand Junction Office) to discuss their <br />April 18, 1997 letter relative to potential occurrences of T&E Species in the Project area <br />and the need for either site-specific wildlife surveys or further consultation. The USFWS <br />Biologist indicated that so long az consumptive water use does not increaze above the <br />93.2cfs acknowledged in the 11/7/96 consultation letter (Attachment B), T&E fish species <br />are not a concern and further consultation would not be required. In addition he noted <br />that; 1) The North Fork of the Gunnison is a known winter use area for the bald eagle, <br />however, bald eagle use is seazonal and nesting is no[ known to occur along the North <br />Fork, and 2) Habitat for the Southwestern willow flycatcher is limited to wetlands and <br />riparian areas. Given these considerations and the lack of any wetlands or riparian areaz <br />within the Project area, the potential for any significant Project-related impacts on either <br />. the bald eagle or flycatcher is negligible and neither site-specific wildlife surveys or <br />additional consultation are warranted or required (Terry Ireland, S/16/97). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.