My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV105347
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV105347
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:17:00 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:25:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/20/1997
Doc Name
OXBOW CARBON & MINERALS INC SOMERSET & SANBORN CREEK MINES PN C-81-002 FOR TR-29 PHASED MINE EXPANSI
From
TERRAMATRIX MONTGOMERY WATSON MINING GRP
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR29
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />• 2.05.3(4) Ponds, Impoundments and Diversions <br />24. Last fall the Division prepared preliminary comments for Oxbow, based upon an informal <br />examination of the applicant's DRAFT design for the proposed coal refuse pile. Within Dr. <br />Pendleton's preliminary adequary comments, a concern was mentioned regarding the possible <br />depth of colluvial/alluvial material in the erosional trough beneath the proposed location of the <br />sediment pond. The sediment pond and its concrete wall dam are proposed to occupy a relatively <br />narrow erosional trough cur through the massive Rollins Sandstone outnop. The Rollins at this <br />location is massive and competent. The applicant proposed to key the concrete wall into the <br />sandstone at each abutment. There is no doubt that this will effectively assist in preventing <br />overturning of the wall under hydrostatic head. However, our concern relates to the applicant's <br />continued lack of a determination of the actual depth and character of the colluvial fill occupying <br />the erosional pocket immediately beneath the proposed pond location. <br />During our walking tour of the site last fall, we specifically discussed this concern with the <br />applicant and WESTEC's representatives. The prospective contractor indicated a possibility of <br />being able to access the site with a backhoe from the adjoining railroad right-of--way. OXBOW <br />intended to request permission from the railroad. However, the only subsurface investigation <br />reported within the design analysis is an auger boring in the west yard, several hundred feet from <br />the pond site. Our concern relates to the possibility of hydraulic effects which might result from <br />uncontrolled flow beneath the concrete wall. WESTEC Drawing N95255-04 an Balaz fr <br />Associates Drawing NOXWVF04, which are essentially identical, both depict the connete wall <br />founded on "random fill" at near original grade with no attempt to limit permeability of the <br />• sediment pond subgrade. <br />In order to satisfy our concern, it will be necessary for OXBOW to verify the depth to the Rollins <br />Sandstone bedrock beneath the concrete pond wall prior to its installation. If possible, the <br />concrete wall should be founded directly upon the competent sandstone. This would require <br />excavation to the bedrock and the preparation of keyway trench. It would not be surprising, <br />however, if competent bedrock was several tens of feet beneath the current depositional surface. <br />The high energy environment of these ledge sandstone outnop valleys can result in the <br />development of surprisingly deep, marrow notches. The location of the railroad embankment <br />immediately downslope may have impounded consulerab[e colluvium during the past several <br />decades. <br />If OXBOW can complete the excavation and determination prior to' final application we <br />recommend that they do so. If they cannot, we recommend that the Division address this concern <br />by placing a stipulation upon the approval. That stipulation should require OXBOW complete <br />the excavation and determination of depth to competent bedrock upon mobilizing to the site. <br />Once the determination is completed the plans should be amended to ensure foundation ojthe <br />concrete sediment wall on bedrock. In the event that depth to bedrock is great enough to favor <br />an alternative construction method, OXBOW shall provide an amended plan design to the <br />Division for review. In no case shall OXBOW proceed with construction ojthe connete pond <br />wall until approval is obtained from the Division. <br />Response: A test pit in the proposed embankment foundation area was completed to a <br />maximum depth of approximately 15 feet on 9/16/96. Based on this test excavation, <br />• foundation chazacteristics are described in a 6/3/97 letter from Lincoln Devote provided <br />with these responses for Insertion in Appendix L. The results of this field investigation <br />indicate that bedrock in the foundation area as represented by the Rollins Sandstone is <br />excessively deep rendering it infeasible to found the embankment wall in bedrock. Lincoln <br />DeVore has, therefore, recommended an alternative construction method involving <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.