My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV104928
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV104928
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:16:24 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 1:22:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/19/2003
Doc Name
Adequacy Responses
From
J.E. Stover & Associates
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
RN4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BRL- Pages 31 and 606 have been revised for consistency. <br />3. On revised page 24 of the submittal dated January 23, 2003, the West Ridge <br />Waste Pile is described as being completed and covered and seeded. However, <br />fteld inspections show that the waste pile has had some recent additions and that <br />these additions have not been covered and seeded. Please revise this section <br />accordingly. <br />The Division stated that is has no further concerns. <br />4. Concerning portal sealing.... <br />There are also Figure 2.05-6 notes that state that the portal seals at both the East <br />Mine and the West Mine do not have concrete seals. However, in a conversation <br />with Basil Bear, BRL stated that there are concrete blocks in place behind the <br />portal seal backfilled material. Please clarify this issue. <br />BRL-$asil Bear states that the West Mine portals aze sealed with concrete block <br />seals and then backfilled with 50 feet of noncombustible material. Additionally, <br />Basil states that the East Mine is only sealed with 50 feet of noncombustible <br />material with no block seals. We have attached a revised Figure 2.05-6 with notes <br />to reflect this. <br />The Division is in the process of updating the reclamation cost estimate for the Bowie <br />No. 1 Mine. When the cost estimate... <br />The Division stated it has no further concems. <br />2.07.6. Criteria for Review of Permit Annlications for Permit Anoroval or Denial <br />8. As required in Rule 2.07.6(1)(6), the Division will conduct a computer check of the <br />Applicant Violator System (AVS). The system recommendation will be conveyed to BRL <br />when it is obtained. The Division will conduct additional AVS checks before the permit <br />renewal is final. <br />No response necessary. <br />If you have any questions, please call me. <br />Sincerely, <br />~~ <br />J. E. Stover, P. E. <br />Consulting Engineer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.