Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 20 <br />(4) Specific mitigation proposed for impact on each item. <br />(5) The proposed threshold of impact -what within the monitoring will trigger mitigation <br />action. <br />Please provide this along with your responses to the second round of adequacy questions. <br />The following responses are arranged by number, corresponding to the original comment letter. For <br />those numbers for which a new comment has been added, the original CDMG comment and the MCC <br />response is included for clarity. <br />2.03.6 Right of Entry and Operation Information <br />Response accepted. <br />2. Original Comment.• Maps 5, 7, 33, 39, 40, 41, 43, 48, 49, 56 and 57 were still not included in <br />the package as indicated by the cover letter. Please note that, because the change in these maps <br />consists solely of the extension of the permit boundary, they don't necessarily need to be <br />included at this stage of the process. The Division's concern is that the cover memo states that <br />they have been included, but we did not receive them. <br />MCC Response: Maps are included with this permit response submittal. <br />New Comment: Maps 5, 7, 33, 39, 40, 41, 43, 48, 49, 56 and 57 were still not included in the package <br />as indicated by the cover letter. Please note that, because the change in these maps consists solely of <br />the extension of the permit boundary, they don't necessarily need to be included at this stage of the <br />process. The Division's concern is that the cover memo states that they have been included, but we did <br />not receive them. <br />2.03.10 Other Licenses and Permits <br />Response accepted. <br />2.04.4 Cultural and Historic Resources <br />4. Response accepted. <br />5. Response accepted. <br />2.04.6 Geology Description <br />