1992-08-07_REVISION - M1974052 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-� III IIIIIIIIIIIII III � • 999 TA TE ni:7 r ng ,9R_1ALDJ MINED LA,VC RECLAMAT10N DIVISION Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman St.. Room 215 Denver,CO 80203 303 866-3567 FAX: 303 832-8106 Roy Romer, August 7, 1992 C0emor Michael B.Long, Mr David R. Chenoweth Division Director Chenoweth and Associates 11730 Wadsworth Blvd Broomfield, CO 80020 n � RE: Adequacy Review, Pit No. I , Permit No. M-74-012 Dear Mr. Chenoweth: I have reviewed your amendment application for Pit No. 1 Permit No. M-74-012 and have the following comments. Please provide response prior to August 24, 1992 . You may request a continuance of this application if you can not respond by the above date. EXHIBIT C-1 Pre-Mining Plan Map 1 . The map shows two wells or other labeled as pumps on the North East portion of Phase 1 and Phase 3. Are these the only wells man made structures located with in 200 feet of the permit area? 2. Rule 2 . 1 .2( 1 )(b) - all maps in the application must be signed by a registered land survey, professional engineer , or other qualified person . 3. Mining Plan map C-1 shows a gas line and a buried telephone cable , please submit the agreement you have with the operators of gas and telephone line in the event the operation impacts the lines . EXHIBIT G. Water Information 1 . On page G-1 paragraph II you stated that three culverts will be installed between the ponds to allow proper drainage and groundwater flow of the site. If any discharge takes place an NPDES Permit from the Health Department is required. There was no indication in amendment application of the need for an NPDES permit, please clarify. You stated that discharge from dewatering the site will be monitored in accordance with the discharge permit to be obtained. An NPDES Permit is a Pre-Requisted for the operation to be approved. 2 . On the second paragraph you stated that the total water requirements for the site will be approximately 1 .2 acre feet. This revision has received a letter from the State Engineers office which states that the "operator had applied for a Water Augmentation plan 1989 but the well permit appl 'cations were returned in 1990 as unacceptable and ha•:a never been refiled with this office. " Before the start or the operation a Water Agumentation plan has to be submitted. On page G-1 paragraph S you stated that all permitted wells in the area are sncwn of rigure G-1 and listed on Table G-1 . There was no figure G-' submi _ ,?d ai ;c t:.-e amendment please submit figure 3-1 .