Laserfiche WebLink
<br />to range from 60-in (for the 1,400 ft depth to coal seam) to 67-in (for the <br />1,100 ft depth to coal seam). <br />B. Maximum subsidence over the first panel in a sequence of panels is always <br />less than subsidence over the subseque t~anels. The predicted maximum <br />subsidence for 12R is 60-in as raft-b®-seen in Figures 2 and 4 of the AVF <br />report. (~lE-3?~ <br />C. Maximum subsidence is offset 100-ff to the north of each panel centerline <br />due to seam dip. The source zone shown on Figure 1 of Exhibit 7F-1 is <br />located south of the panel center where subsidence is further reduced (from <br />maximum). <br />D. Subsidence in the source zone is further influenced by its proximity to the <br />start room of Panel 12R. Maximum subsidence will not develop until point ~, <br />located approximately full depth or 1,100 ft from the start room. The source <br />zone immediately above the road is located between 400 and 800-ft from the <br />start room of Panel 12R. <br />April 10, 2000A11 of these factors are built into the prediction of 30-in subsidence <br />at the source zone. Sl~~ -? (w...-~- 3,,,~ S . l o,r~< <.~ --il.~,~- 7 <br />18. In addition to the early, 1994 subsidence monitoring, extensive subsidence <br />measurements have also been carried out along the County Road and Railroad <br />that crosses the Eastern Mining District. Twentymile has proposed continued <br />monitoring of County Road 33 as it is influenced by Panel 12R from a point 1000- <br />ft east of the start room to the point where the 9R monitoring program began. In <br />addition, detailed measurements will be made along the railroad alignment <br />providing confirmation of the angle of draw, profile shape, and maximum <br />subsidence for the fully developed profile of 12R. <br />19. The recommendations provided in the Rockfall hazards report are based on the <br />assessment that cliff failure above County Road 33 in the 12R Study Area is <br />unlikely. The proposal to close the road for short periods (i.e., hours at a time) to <br />remove loose rock blocks from the top of the outcrop or source zone is a <br />precautionary action based on a conservative approach to risk management. It <br />should also be emphasized that this area of the Twentymile sandstone outcrop <br />differs significantly from areas that previously failed in regard to topographic <br />relief, foreslope conditions, and magnitude of predicted subsidence and strain. <br />However, if the primary concern of the reviewer is stability of the cliff following <br />mining, Twentymile will carry out a survey of the outcrop following undermining <br />and report the results of this survey, along with any recommendations, to DOGM. <br />If [his approach does no[ completely resolve your comment, may we suggest a <br />field meeting to enable presentation, review, and resolution of your detailed <br />concerns. <br />20. TCC will follow the recommendation in Exhibit 7F-1. <br />21. Please see comments to responses l9 and 22. <br />