Laserfiche WebLink
TR-96 Response2 Letter (Cont'd) <br />Page 2 <br />the stipulation that Deal Gulch pond not be constructed until static factor of safety <br />calculations have been completed and approved. <br />• Comment 5 response: A revised page 3-ISb has been included to address potential <br />discharge from highwall mining entries. <br />• Comment 6 response _A discussion of structures and renewable resources overlying azeas <br />proposed for highwall mining is included on revised page 3-156. <br />• Comment 7 response: This comment has been resolved. <br />• Comment 8 response: A sentence was added to permit page 3-31 that wmmits Trapper <br />to monitoring air blast for all blasts that occur during every third year of the remaining <br />mine life. This blast monitoring schedule would initiate in 2006. The following sentence <br />was revised to indicate that blast monitoring will be conducted by either a contractor or <br />Trapper in-house personnel. <br />• Comment 9 response: A description of the types, capabilities, sensitivities and locations <br />of blasting monitors was added to permit page 3-31. Because all of the new blasting <br />narrative could not fit onto page 3-31, new permit page 3-31a was created and is <br />enclosed. <br />• Comment 10 response: Permit Table 3.4-1 was modified to include reference to the <br />"Coy" monitoring site. <br />• Comment 11 response. This comment has been resolved. <br />• Comment 12 response. This comment has been resolved. <br />Please contact me or Jim Mattern if you have any additional questions regazding the enclosed <br />information. <br />Sincerely, <br />/ _- <br />Forrest Luke <br />Environmental Manager <br />FVL [M/Permit Revisioos~l'R•96 Response2 I.etter.dac] <br />c Sane[ Binns-lwo copies w/ attachme>tts <br />File 109.2.3.4 w/o allaclunenls <br />Revisions File <br />