Laserfiche WebLink
~/ <br />.yY 1 ~- ~ <br />/~ <br />`' '~_.. <br />A. NEMETM @M~q <br />Tr~Onn v, px <br />WRON L p~001 <br />YAli1C E WNL4DW <br />RO~~ K YM18d~ <br />L MVRIN Nlffi~µJI.1 <br />0. HTE106M <br />MB~~LOMT$~ <br />im s tFdor+. scurf x+ <br />vo. eox ie~s <br />COIOpADO 9Pf8NCiS CIXARADO lOY07 <br />May 10, 1989 <br />FEDERAL EXPRESS <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />and Board <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Attn: Mr. Dan Hernandez <br />Re: Your file no. M-77-210 <br />Permit Application for Snyder Quarry <br />E1 Paso County, Colorado <br />Castle Concrete, Applicant <br />Dear Mr. Hernandez: <br />ras.o.~ <br />TF)SOOG~ <br />~eor~n <br />nvav-zap <br /> <br />~dJ1Y 11 1~g9 <br />NiENED LANL <br />RECLAMATION DIVISIOPa <br />This firm represents First Federal of Maryland, Sioux Valley <br />Savings and Loan Association, Metropolitan Federal Bank, Preferred <br />Savings 5 Loan Association, Northlake Federal Savings and Loan <br />Association, owners, as tenants in common, of a substantial portion <br />of the Cedar Heights Subdivision, Colorado Springs, E1 Paso County, <br />Colorado. The Cedar Heights Subdivision abuts Castle Concrete's <br />mining land and lies south and east of that land. <br />These owners oppose Castle Concrete's permit application dated <br />March 2, 1969, will he affected and aggrieved if the permit is <br />granted, and request that a Formal Hearing be held. These owners <br />ask that the Board review the following items, as may be <br />supplemented, which may affect and aggrieve these owners: (1) the <br />excessive dust caused by the mine which has been and will continue <br />to be an esthetic problem, a pollution hazard, and a health hazard <br />for present and future residents and guests of Cedar Heights; (Z) <br />the potential, admitted harm to the natural stream which runs <br />between the proposed additional mining area and the existing mining <br />area; (3) the failure to provide for a natural reclamation of the <br />area and which may nut result in cover equal to the natural <br />vegetation of the surrounding area; (4) no adequate arrangement for <br />topsoil replacement has been made in the reclamation plan; (S) after <br />the proposed reclamation, the adverse visual effects on the <br />subdivision brill continue for many years and the value of the <br />subdivision property will be adversely affected; (6) the proposed <br />method of mining the existing permit area and the new permit area <br />may result in undesirable erosion and difficult reclamation which <br />may nut self-regenerate; and (7) ruck spillage into non permit areas <br />is admittably probable. These owners reserve the right to <br />supplement these items. <br />SPARKS, DUC. ENOCH & WINSLOW, PC. <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />