My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV101324
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV101324
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:11:50 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:44:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/15/1993
Doc Name
PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW PR-03 EASTERN MINING DIST FOIDEL CREEK MINE PN C-82-056
From
DMG
To
TWENTYMILE COAL CO
Type & Sequence
PR3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiuiiiiiiiiiiii • <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department o(Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone 1303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (3031 8 3 2-8106 <br />September 15, 1993 <br />Mr. Rick Mills <br />Twentymile Coal Company <br />29587 Routt County Road No. 27 <br />Oak Creek, CO 80467 <br />RE: Preliminary Adequacy Review, PR-03 Eastern Mining District <br />Foidel Creek Mine, Permit No. C-82-056 <br />Dear Mr. Mills: <br />of cow <br />,~44 <br />Ne j <b <br />. ~ <br />~' <br />a <br />rB]6 ~ e <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />M~chael8 Long <br />Division Director <br />The Division has completed review of your Permit Revision application (PR-03), <br />Eastern Mining District for the Foidel Creek i4ine. Please respond to each <br />issue as appropriate. <br />General Comments <br />1. The zip code on p. 2.03-12(a) for Englewood is incorrect. <br />2. Page Ex. 14-7(c), last paragraph, last sentence does not make sense. <br />(sits) (rocks) <br />3. Page 2.03-24 was submitted separately from the updated, stapled section <br />for Rule 2.03 and reads differently. Which is correct? <br />4. Page 2.05-43, the last sentence under the Eastern Mining District does <br />not read correctly. <br />5. Page 2.05-54(g)(1) does not flow to the following page 2.05-55 (revised <br />5/12/89, MR89-29). <br />6. The Fish Creek vent fan reclamation plan proposed at the top of page <br />2.05-77(a) is not the currently approved plan. Please delete the <br />paragraph. <br />Rule 2.03 <br />1. Please update the section concerning individuals who collected and <br />analyzed data for the TCC permit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.