REV100527 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

EXHIBIT F -Reclamation Plan Map 24. Section 6.4.6(b) of the Rules requires that [his map portray the proposed final land use for each portion of the affected lands. Please show on your map the approximate boundazy between exposed water surface, wetlands and upland (dry) azeas. EXHIBIT G -Water Information 25. In accordance with Rule 6.4.7(2)(a), locate on [he "Exhibit C Map" [he three Kazen Topper wells and all other wells within 600 fee[ of the amendment azea affected lands. 26. Your response to the requirements of this exhibit appears to be information the State Engineer's Office would need for a Substitute Supply Plan or an Augmentation Plan. Please provide responses [o all of the applicable requirements of Section 6.4.7(2)(a)(b)(c) (3)(4) and (5), which requires an affirmative statement [hat the operator /applicant has acquired (or has applied for) a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the Water Quality Control Division at the Colorado Department of Health, if necessary. EXHIBIT H -Wildlife Information 27. The Division of Wildlife letter from Stephanie Durno, District Wildlife Manager is a brief overview and not based on a review of the amendment proposal or an in-depth on-site inspection of [he property. The DOW cannot comment on the application after the end of the comment period. However, you should obtain a copy of any more in-depth analysis the DOW prepazes/ed for Adams County plus other wildlife information available on the azea to address Section 6.4.9(1)(c )(the presence and estimated population of threatened or endangered species from either federal or state lists). Ms Durno says in her letter that there is a very good possibility of nesting birds, particulazly raptors in [he proposed amendment azea. Because these birds and their nests are protected at the state and federal levels, she recommends a nesting bird survey prior to any development. She says the best time of yeaz for this to be done is during nesting season in eazly May. Aggregate Industries should consider conducting such a survey to protect itself from inadvertently breaking state or federal law regazding protected birds and their nests. 28. The DOW letter in your exhibit makes some recommendations such as irregulaz shorelines and the addition of one or more islands 15'x25' per 2 surface acres of constructed water surface. Please state whether you will incorporate her recommendation in your application and if so, make the appropriate additions. EXHIBIT L -Reclamation Costs 29. This exhibit will be reviewed separately so [ha[ the applicant can have [he bulk of the review items as soon as possible. Responses to these review items may change [he Reclamation Cost calculations. EXHIBIT S -Permanent Man-Made Structures 30. Given that the mining limit set back from adjacent property is 35 feet from the east propeRy line, it is evident from the pre-operation inspection and scaled measurements from [he Mining Plan Map [hat a fence on the property line and a residence and out building on [he Topper property and buildings on the Gibson property aze within 200 feet of affected (mined) land. Please add these structures to this exhibit and address them in accordance with Rule 6.4.19(a)(b)(c). 31. Ms Topper, in her objection letter located her wells and well vault within 200 feet of the affected (mined) land boundary. Locate these wells on [he Pre-Mining Plan Map, Exhibit C, list them in this exhibit and address [hem in accordance with Rule 6.4.19(a)(b)(c).