My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV100442
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV100442
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:10:55 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:36:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/1/1992
Doc Name
ADEQUACY FOR 1991 RENEWAL WEST ELK MINE FN C-80-007
From
MLRD
To
MOUNTAIN COAL CO
Type & Sequence
TR64
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Welt <br />Page 3 <br />not, please update this table to include all culverts presently on <br />site. <br />D. Has MCC conducted a detailed survey of all site culverts as <br />requested in the April 9, 1991 adequacy review? As a result of <br />this survey, do specifications of all culverts need to be updated? <br />2. See response to VI, 1, A and V2, 1, D concerning a detailed <br />drainage control map. <br />3. Upon review of the Division's inspection reports of August 1986 <br />and May 1987, the Division still upholds the recommendations made <br />concerning the upper diversion ditch: removal of slide debris in <br />the ditch would cause a much greater disturbance and could <br />potentially trigger further sliding. MCC should verify that the <br />drainage control system will not be jeopardized by the additional <br />flow, which passes the non-functional portion of the diversion <br />ditch. <br />4. As the rock buttress on the east toe of the Refuse Pile has <br />been completed, the issue of an "extra ditch" no longer exists. <br />5. Upon review of the permit, it has been determined that the <br />Sylvester Gulch Fan site is the only small area exemption. <br />Pursuant to Rule 4.05.2(3), MCC must demonstrate that the runoff <br />from this area meets effluent standards. <br />6. This response is acceptable to the Division. <br />VII. Bonding <br />1. The bond estimation completed by MCC was submitted as part of <br />the reorganized permit document, TR 59. This estimation was <br />separated from the technical revision and completed as a bond <br />adjustment in relation to this renewal process. <br />April 24, 1991 Letter <br />I. Permit Boundary <br />1. Upon review of Map 53 and a field inspection conducted on May <br />5, 1992, the loadout area is entirely included in the permit area <br />and therefore will be reclaimed. Permit boundary signs have been <br />hung to accurately show that Map 53 corresponds with on-the-ground <br />conditions. All drainage from the loadout site is currently <br />designed to be accommodated by a sediment pond, MB-4, already in <br />place. The drainage control design implementation will be verified <br />during upcoming inspections. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.