REV99861 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

23. Page 2.04.10-45 -Please bring the text on this page into agreement with Table 2.04.10. The text states that "16% of the study area and 5% of the permit area" are composed of farmsteads, orchards, facilities and other. This statement does not appear to account for the proposed increase in permit area. According to table 2.04.10, this land use category needs to be increased to 8.2% of the permit area. 24. Page 2.04.106 -The sentence, "Facilities were identified as farm support areas located rescues, Kentucky bluegrass, away from farmsteads " This sentence does not make sense. Please clarify what is meant by this statement. Additionally, the number of ponds/diversion structures included in the expanded permit area needs to be updated. 25. Page 2.05.4(2)(e)-14 The table and text are not in agreement with Map ADJ 2.05.4-4. The text and table indicate their will be one area and type of irrigated hayland re- established. Map ADJ2.05.4~ shows two locations and two different irrigated haylands. Due to the different treatments of these two reclamation types does WFC propose to have the same standards applied to both types, as indicated on page 2.05.4(2)(e)-15? Please clarify the disagreement between the text, table, and map. 26. Table 2.04.11-1 Please update the table to reflect the habitat acreages within the proposed permit area, and update acreage percentages discussed on pages 2.14.11-4 and 2.04.11-6. 27. In the table of contents "List of Tables", there are no footnotes that refer to the superscripts "1" and ""'. Please clarify this and then change the wording on page 2.04.11-1 from "renewing" a permit to "revising" a permit. 28. Page 2.05.6(2)-1 The permit now states that WFC will commit to plant hedgerows...however this commitment was dropped in a previous permitting action. Unless WFC wants to re-commit, please remove the statement. 29. Minor text typo's were noted on pages 2.04.7-31 and 32 (rag/I, ?mg/l, 1980 through 198?). These should be corrected. 30. Units in Table 2.04.5-2 are confusing. Are they millions of cubic meters? 31. Map 2.04.7-1 submitted with PR-04 has eliminated information which is required by Rule 2.04.7(4). Please review the requirements of 2.04.7(4) and submit a new map as appropriate. 32. Rule 2.05.3(4)(a)(iii) requires, if the pond has an embankment in excess of 10 feet, that the Division receive the plans that were submitted to the State Engineer. Please submit these plans.