My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV99545
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV99545
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:23:25 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:27:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977436
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/11/2000
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO YOUR LETTER DATED AUGUST 24 2000-CAMAS COLO INC TOWER PIT 1 PN M-1977-436 AMENDMENT
From
BANKS AND GESSO LLC
To
CITY OF BRIGHTON
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />• Noise standards are set by State Statute for various uses at property boundaries and <br />CAMAS is committed to meet those standards here as it does at all of its operations. <br />Cities and counties do not have the legal authority to change these statutory <br />requirements on a project by project basis. Additionally, the Division of Minerals and <br />Geology (DMG) does not regulate or enforce noise standards. This is usually left to <br />the local jurisdiction which, in this case, is Adams County. <br />• Conceming dust and dust abatement, there are APEN permits required both for the <br />site and for each piece of equipment on site. CAMAS already has the required <br />permits and they are being modified for the new parcels added. The DMG does not <br />regulate or enforce APEN's. These permits are issued and enforced by the Colorado <br />Department of Health and Environment <br />• Conceming the City desires to see wet mining versus dry mining, this is not possible. <br />The properties have been condemned by the City of Thomton for reclamation to <br />water storage reservoirs. In order to maximize storage capacity and to construct the <br />reservoir linings, the mine must be dry. The recamation of the mine to a water <br />storage reservoir is regulated in part by the DMG and the storage liner is regulated <br />by the State Engineer. <br />• CAMAS participated in the Platte River Heritage Corridor study as they own quite a <br />bit of property along the river. They have donated several hundred acres at other <br />locations to Adams County Parks to help implement this plan. Conceming this site, <br />the trial condor is planned for the eastside of the South Platte River and not the <br />west-side. Adams County Parks has asked for an easement along Riverdale Road <br />to move people and CAMAS has agreed to the dedication. In addition, the north lake <br />(current mining area) will not be lined and used for water storage (pending <br />agreement with Thomton). This lake is proposed for wetland banking and CAMAS is <br />working with Adams County Parks to leave the area as open space possibly through <br />a conservation easement. <br />• The setback from the river is being regulated through an Adams County Floodplain <br />permit process in conjunction with the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. <br />UDFCD has criteria for setbacks, riverbank stabilization, pit side slope protection, <br />etc. This is being engineered for the entire 1.5 miles of river frontage to both <br />accommodate maximization of water storage for Thomton and to protect and <br />stabilize the river under UDFCD guidelines. Without this joint effort, this entire <br />stretch of river would not be stabilized. The 800 foot buffer you asked for would not <br />meet Thomton's requirements and would not help with the stabilization plan for the <br />river. <br />• Reclamation of the land is tied to extraction of the resource and to construction of the <br />reservoirs. The market determines how quickly the sand and gravel resource can be <br />extracted. In addition, CAMAS has committed in its County amendment to not <br />increase truck traffic north on Riverdale Road. Even if the market could absorb the <br />material faster, iF we were to cut the timeline in half, twice the number of trucks on <br />Riverdale Road would be needed to haul the material out and CAMAS does not feel <br />that this would be appropriate. This ties to our earlier proposal to Brighton where we <br />proposed moving the material via conveyor to the eastside of the river in order to <br />remove the trucks from Riverdale Road and, as you remember, this idea was <br />rejected by Joe Gerdom. <br />• The permits are structured to save the mature stands of trees on the properties <br />involved. Additional vegetation is planned as contained in the reclamation plan. The <br />reclamation plan is dictated by the end-use of water storage. The reclamation plan is <br />regulated by the DMG. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.