My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV99160
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV99160
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:23:06 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:23:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/12/2004
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Responses
From
Twentymile Coal Company
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR44
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Twenrymi[e Coa! COMOQOV - Foide! Creek Mine. TR04-44 Tq Resvonses 8/72/2004 <br />Response: The referenced map has been revised to include this information. <br />Item 8. Map 1 S. Please add anv boundaries of the permit that tav thereon. [Rule 2.10.1(3)) <br />Response: The referenced map has been revised to include this information. <br />Item 9. Page 2.04-50.2, line 42. Map 1S. The "ExistingAVF" delineation is reported as <br />being on Map S-1. The existing AVF is not indicated on the map. Please add this <br />delineation. A reference to the source o this information would be appropriate. <br />Response: The referenced map has been revised to include this information. <br />Item 10. Map 1 S. The grass f lter appears to designated by the wetland legend (color). <br />Please use a unique color for the Brass filter. <br />Response: The referenced map has been revised to differentiate the grass filter from <br />wetland areas. <br />Item 11. Map IS. Please have the map certified thereon. [Rule 2.10.3(2)) <br />Response: Michael W. Ludlow, a professional engineer in the state of Colorado has <br />certified the maps. <br />Item 12. Map 2S. See Items 7, 8, and 11 for application as appropriate to Map IS. <br />Response: Please refer to the previous response to Item 5. <br />Item 13. Page Z.04-S0, line 44. Comment. Text indicates that the soils report is <br />summarized. However, a description of what is to be approved by the Division is required. <br />Items 19 and 20 are examples of this guidance. <br />Response: Pages 2.04-50 through 2.04-50.2 have been reviewed and revised to respond to <br />the request for specific identification of the information and activities to be approved. <br />Item 14. Pages 2.04-SO and 2.04-50.1. The location ofsoil test holes was described in <br />general terms (i.e., sections). Test hole locations were indicated on Figure 2 ofExhibit <br />25T. If not more precisely located on some other document, please add this reference to the <br />statement. <br />Response: In order to reduce costs, the same test holes were used for both the soils <br />evaluation and the geotechnical analysis, as shown on the referenced figure. A reference <br />has been added to the soils text. <br />Item I5. Page 2.04-50.1, line 31. The soils report is referenced as Exhibit 2. It was <br />submitted as Exhibit 16C. If appropriate, please change "Exhibit 2" to read "Exhibit <br />I6C ". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.