Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Concem: Reclamation Cost determination for moving overburden in either north-south or west~ast <br />direction where appropriate. <br />Response: Colorado Lien review of cut and fill volumes for reclamation revealed the need ti <br />rehandle 85,727 cu. yd. By moving excess "cut" material from Area I to Area 2, adding another "fill" <br />area to Area 2 and moving the remainder of excess "cut" material from Area 2 to Area 3, an ~~verall <br />balance was achieved. Additional equipment (1 CAT 9881oader, 3 769 trucks, 1 motor grader and 1 <br />water track) was used to haul the material. Estimated production times were developed using <br />infom~ation fiom the Caterpillar Performance Hand Book -Edition 27 and a maximum haulal;e <br />distance of 4000 feet. Fifty-six percent of the material [o be hauled will be moved 2000 ft, or less, <br />however the other 44% could be hauled up to 4000 feet. To simplify calculations and build iri reserve, <br />all material was assumed to be hauled 4000 feet. Previously demonstrated unit costs for a do;:er <br />pushing 270 ft. were used for respreading that material at the new destination. Estimated production <br />rates and costs are included and summarized in following pages, <br />Concem: The type, size and number of equipment units to be used during reclamation to move <br />overburden, perform rough grading, apply soil amendments, prepare the seed bed and perform. seeding <br />need to be included in the reclamation cost for each query. 71tere should also be a <br />mobilization/demobilizationeost for each piece of equipment to be rued. <br />Response: Moving overburden and rough grading will be performed by the 3 D9 dozers, 1 588 <br />loader and 3 Cat 769 trucks previously mentioned. Mobilization cost for this equipment has been <br />included ip the Revised Summary of Costs. Colorado Lien proposes a hydroseeding and bloom <br />mulch reclamation technique that has worked in our quarries. Previously estimated costs for this <br />operation were increased to include mobilization and demobilization of one hydroseeding/mulching <br />truck, one tractor and disc or chisel ($1,000). Native Seeders of Longmont has done work on This site <br />for $500 per acre plus $500 for mobilization and demobilization. Therefore our estimated costs are <br />very conservative. <br />Tom, at the risk of sounding confrontational, as that is certainly not our intentions, based on nrw <br />infornation and bids received since January I5, 1998 and by addressing concerns raised by the: <br />Department of Nature! Resources, Colorado Lien's cost for Preparation for Seeding and cost f ~r <br />Revegetation were actually reduced from our Janttary proposal of $691,141 to $546,258 (-$144,882). <br />Revised Bonding Costs now total: <br />Demolition at Owl Canyon $141,835 <br />Mobilization/Demobilization 5,000 <br />Demolition at Rex Qua[ry 113, I52 <br />Mobilization/Demobilization 5,000 <br />Roberts Road Reclamation 10,860 <br />Preparation for Seeding <br />(blasting, dozipg, dealing) 354,623 <br />Revegetatloq 191,635 <br />Total Direct Costs $822,105 <br />Total Indrrect Costs (18.15%) $149,212 <br />Total Bonding Cosb $97117 <br />