REV98492 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

+ • • Er~viror~n~er~~, Ir~c. LARR,~LnDCwBRIAN ~~~~5~~~~• ARVADAdSO~~ORAD097OOO4E sEP 1 ~ ~s3~ September 17, 1985 f~iINEDlrAND REC? P,P.4A?!dN d!VISIC~~! Ms. Cami~l~ M. Farrell Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division 1313 Sherman Street Suite 423 Denver, Colorado 80203 Dear Ms. Farrell; Re: Robinson Brick Company, Apache 9 and 9A Conversion and Amendment MLR File N0. 78-09 On behalf of our Client Robinson Brick Company we will respond to your adequacy letter questions in the same format as they were asked. The copies of the adjoining landowner Certified return receipt requested cards have been submitted. Enclosed are 4 application forms with the revisions made as requested. Please replace the forms in the books in your possession. Thank you for bring this to our attention. Exhibit C - Pre- Mining and Mining Plan Map 1. Please refer to the Legal Descriptions submitted in the Apache 9 and 9A applications. You may note in the applica- tions for Apache 9 and 9A that there were no distinct outlines. But rather maximum disturbance areas. 2. Note on Map Exhibit C, Affected Lands; the area outlined with a broken line. These areas are the Pre-law disturbance areas. Robinson does not know at this time which areas will be re-disturbed. This will depend on the areas to be mined and the demands for clay/brick in the market place. If these areas are re-disturbed Robinson realizes they will be responsible for reclamation in these areas. 3. If Robinson plans to mine within 200 feet of any man made structure (buildings) they will get a mitigation agreement ~~~j with the owner of that building prior to commencement of F^v~•~ mining within the 200 feet. I have argued with the staff before about the Legislatures intent when they used the word "Structure" in the law. I still maintain their intent was