Laserfiche WebLink
<br />June 8, 1990 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />This is a distinct possibility if substantial swell 01 <br />material is experienced in the later phases. Under tY <br />permit RRI would only be able to reclaim to the arbit~ <br />boundary beneath the cliffs. Without an amendment, RF <br />unable to propose a TR which would take advantage of tk <br />topography and eliminate a dangerous and ugly site feat <br />Second, RRI has noted that in later phases, the dive <br />from the Columbia Ditch may be changed. Again, RRI <br />submit a TR if and when the relocation became nece: <br />option is not available unless the permitted acreage <br />and the boundary changed in such a way to include <br />portion of the ditch within the permit area. <br />excavated <br />existing <br />iry permit <br />would be <br />:existing <br />ire. <br />rn point <br />posed to <br />This <br />southern <br />For these reasons, RRI is submitting a revised Plate 4. The June <br />8, 1990 Revision of Plate 4 depicts a permit area of 192 acres, and <br />will provide RRI with needed flexibility for f ture mine <br />operations. The affected areas for purposes of bond'ng remain <br />unchanged. <br />RRI believes the change in boundary is appropriate as <br />this permit amendment. Interested parties have been nc <br />will have opportunity to comment on the change, The c <br />not alter the list of adjacent landowners. The Chang <br />effect the mine plan, or reclamation plan. Instead, <br />provides a simplified permitting procedure so that in <br />additional, desirable reclamation may be accomplished. <br />Sincerely, <br />LAW OFFICES OF J. KEMPER WILL <br />~ ~~.~~~ <br />h P. Schmuck <br />/JPS <br />Enclosures <br />cc: Park County Clerk and Recorder <br />Reclamation Resources <br />Diane Nelson <br />a part of <br />:ified and <br />range does <br />does not <br />he change <br />.he future <br />OJN12 <br />