Laserfiche WebLink
enter this land, please revise page 2.03-16 to comply with Rule 2.03.6(1). If BRL does not <br />have the right-to-enter this [and, in order to avoid confusion in the future, please revise <br />Map-Ol to show that BRL does not have the right-to-enter on this land in order to <br />conduct surface mining operations. <br />The Division has no further concerns. BRL has revised the permit boundary so that the <br />land owned by William G. Hughes has been excluded. <br />Applicant Violator System <br />15. The Division has conducted an initial computer check of the Applicant Violator System. <br />The recommendation was a conditional issue. The system listed nineteen violations for <br />companies that are within the corporate structure that includes Bowie Resources. All <br />violations involve companies in Kentucky, West Virginia and Virginia and all violations <br />are under settlement agreements. <br />No response was needed. <br />Adequacy Review Comments From Other A eg ncies <br />16. The Office of Surface Mining (OSM) has stated that PR-OS constitutes a mine plan <br />change requiring Secretarial approval. OSM will issue its mine plan change decision <br />after the Division issues its proposed decision. <br />No response was needed. <br />17. Attached is a letter, dated June 16, 2001, that the Division received from the Colorado <br />Historical Society (CHS). In the letter, the CHS stated that the cultural resource survey <br />showed that tto historic sites existed in the affected area. <br />No response was needed. <br />18. In a telephone conversation on July 25, 2001, BRL's consultant, Jim Stover, stated chat <br />the operations proposed in PR-OS will not increase the coal production rate or the water <br />depletion estimate over that already accounted for itt PR-04. This information has been <br />forwarded by telephone to the U.S. Fish &Wildlife Service to aid in their consultation. <br />The Division has no further concerns. In a letter dated July 31, 2001, the USF&WS <br />determined that no additional water depletion would result from the activities proposed in <br />PR-O5. A copy of this letter had been sent to BRL previously. <br />