My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV97047
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV97047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:31 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:05:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/23/1994
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO DIVISION CONCERNS PR PN C-81-044 CYPRUS EMPIRE CORP
From
CYPRUS EMPIRE CORP
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
RN2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CEC Response <br />As discussed, CEC will submit this information under separate letter in the interest <br />of completing the issuance of the permit renewal. This will allow CEC to assess <br />the requested information and provide a summation of any observed trends, <br />without delaying the renewal any further. <br />DMG Concern <br />III.B.7. Section 2.05.6(6)-1 Observed Impacts needs to be updated to <br />include current data. A graph for the conductivity field in the Williams <br />Fork River was updated and shows good agreement between the <br />upstream and downstream conductivities. However, an evaluation <br />of trends for other water quality parameters such as solids, pH or <br />iron, is not possible, because Table 26 and 27 present only <br />maximums, minimums, means and standard deviations over a ten <br />year period from 1982 to 1992. <br />The update should include current data presented in such a way that <br />trends can be evaluated by the Division. The current method of <br />reporting (presenting a statistical evaluation over a ten year period) <br />does not allow an evaluation of trends. A table of yearly means, <br />maximums and minimums is one example of an acceptable way of <br />summarizing the data so that trends could be evaluated. Another <br />acceptable method would be to provide a graphical presentation. <br />CEC Response <br />As discussed, CEC feels that the requested yearly min, max, mean information has <br />already been provided to the Division in the form of the AHR, wherein can be <br />found the pertinent information for each year specific to that AHR. CEC will <br />provide the requested information under separate letter as discussed with both <br />yourself and Ms. Pavlik. At this time, CEC is not determined the most effective <br />manner of conveying the requested information, but this item will be addressed <br />within the previously discussed 90 day timeframe. Please contact us should you <br />have further questions on this matter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.