Laserfiche WebLink
6. The drainage and sediment control map depicts a stock pond adjacent to Pond 9-F2. <br />The Division was unable to locate any designs for this stock pond. It appears that <br />two drainages, 9-D11 and 9-D]2 are routed to this stock pond. Please provide the <br />Division with sediment control designs for this pond, or direct us to where it may be <br />located in the permit. <br />The Division was unable to locate a small area exemption (SAI?) demonstration for <br />the topsoil berm located at the AMOCO stock pond. Please provide the Division <br />with designs for the SAE and depict the structure on the sediment control map. <br />8. The road leading to the SA portal area is currently classified as an access road. As <br />a result of revision of Rule 1.04.111(a), effective August 1, 1995, any road used to <br />haul coal or coal mine waste is now defined as a haul road. Please revise the permit <br />pages and maps for this road. All haul roads must meet the performance standards <br />of Rule 4.03.1. <br />9. As required by amended Rule 2.05.4(2), permit applications need to include detailed <br />reclamation plans for any roads which are to be modified for retention as part of the <br />post-mining land use. This would include any realignment, width reduction, or <br />resurfacing that may be required. The Division was unable to locate any reclamation <br />plans or modification plans for the roads permitted at the minx: site. Please provide <br />the Division with a plan for any realignment, width reduction or resurfacing, <br />including a detailed description of proposed reclamation activities, supporting plan, <br />drawings, and/or cross sections, and a detailed estimate of associated reclamation <br />cost. <br />10. Page 2.05.6(6)-2 starts in the middle of a sentence that does not follow the previous <br />page. Please make the appropriate changes to the page. <br />11. Significant trends in water quality were not noted in the bedrock monitoring wells. <br />The #5 mine dischazge showed a slight increase in TDS, whereas the 7 North Angie <br />discharge showed a slight decrease in TDS. The decease in the 7 North Angle <br />dischazge was explained by the fact that TDS levels were pre~zously elevated during <br />a pump malfunction where the groundwater had time to equilibrate with respect to <br />TDS. The operator predicts that the maximum TDS of 1474 mg/I observed in the <br />7 North Angle discharge represents the maximum predi~~ted postmining TDS <br />concentrations. This prediction does not appear to be in tl~e potential hydrologic <br />consequences (PHC) of the permit. Please update the PHC as necessary. <br />12. Page 2.05.3-40Ra refers to the "new" No. 9 Mine. The entire subsequent section <br />refers to the No. 9 Mine in the future. Please update thi, section to reflect the <br />current status of the Number 9 Mine. <br />