My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-12-27_REVISION - M1992054
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1992054
>
2005-12-27_REVISION - M1992054
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:55:40 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:58:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992054
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/27/2005
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
DMG
To
Matt Carnahan
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Please include the stormwater runoff control structures within the phases or affected area. If the structures are to be <br />within the natural drainageway(s) please include an appropriate engineering evaluation supporting the adequacy of <br />the capacity (evaluation to be placed under Exhibit G). <br />Discussion during the 12/13/05 pre-operation inspection included a likely new entrance location and access road. <br />The map(s) should include that, and all other revised roadway locations. <br />The main onsite haul road roughly paralleling the buried waterline crosses two arroyos, though there is no <br />improved crossing structure in either arroyo. If such structures are to be installed to support the mining operation, <br />please include them on the maps, and the descriptions under Exhibit D. <br />Exhibit D - Minine Plan (Rule 6.4.4) <br />Please clarify several items concerning highwall reclamation: what will be the maximum slope of the highwall <br />during mining; what will be the maximum length of the active highwall during mining; what method of highwall <br />reduction will be used (e.g., cut and fill, or backfilling). An important part of the reclamation costs is the earthwork <br />required for reduction of the highwall gradient to meet the 3:1 slope for reclamation. <br />The plan states that there will be a maximum of 20 acres disturbed by mining. Since "mining" (per Rule 1.1(27)) <br />includes all activities and disturbances associated with an operation, this statement must extend to include haul <br />roads, stockpile areas, processing areas, and equipment storage areas, etc. For bonding purposes it must also <br />include areas that were affected but not yet fully reclaimed. Please revise this acreage figure if necessary. <br />Please state whether mining will expose the underlying sandstone. To attain adequate rangeland vegetation during <br />reclamation, a minimum depth of material, including topsoil, must overlie the sandstone. If mining exposes the <br />sandstone, then more backfilled material must be replaced as part of reclamation, which will affect the bond <br />amount. <br />There are several stmctures and features that could be adversely impacted by mining or reclamation earthwork, or <br />by mine traffic. Please clarify what the minimum setback distance(s) will be between your activities and the <br />following features: overhead electric powerpoles, buried gaslines, sandstone outcrops (arroyo rims), gas wells or <br />pads, gas well roads, buried waterlines, and imgation ditches. Please specify what the slope gradient will be for <br />powerpole pedestals after mining. <br />The slope gradient during mining as well as the depth of mining will affect the width of unmined land around the <br />margin of the pit that is necessary for performing reclamation. Stockpiling of overburden and topsoil along some of <br />these pit margins may necessitate need for additional room for equipment maneuvering. Please ensure that <br />sufficient unmined land is allowed to remain so that reclamation can be performed according to your plan. <br />The overburden and topsoil that are to be sepazately stripped and stockpiled, are also assumed to be separately <br />replaced. Is this correct? While in stockpile prior to reclamation, will both the overburden and topsoil be <br />vegetated? What will they be vegetated with, and at what rates? <br />Please include a noxious weed control plan to be followed during the mining stages. <br />Exhibit E -Reclamation Plan (Rule 6.4.5) <br />Please provide more details about the overburden and topsoil replacement. Since some of these materials to be <br />replaced maybe stockpiled several hundred feet from where they are to be placed during reclamation, please clarify <br />what types of equipment will be used. <br />Please specify the minimum depth of material, to remain or to be placed, over the sandstone bedrock. If less than <br />two feet is proposed, please describe how the bedrock layer will be prepared (such as by fracturing) to provide <br />adequate rooting depth. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.