Laserfiche WebLink
12/20/1996 15:15 719275.5 MCDERh10TT LAW~N1 PAGE 03 <br />... <br />Mr. Thomas A. Schreiner ~ y <br />December 20, 1996 ~ <br />Page 2 ~ /~Jb~ - <br />~.~ .~ ,~. <br />~ D~'~~ A n <br />4. We wish it be made Ilea hat--~he~propoaed haul road, as <br />finally designed and approved will-be"wholly constructed prior <br />to and as a precondition ~o ~:gmmen~emQnt"of `operations in the <br />expanded area. s; - <br />~; <br />5. The reclamation plan, andRfinancial arrangements therefore, <br />~;... <br />may not be adequate. ~~ , •- ~ ~ ;.. ~d, <br />6. We remain concerned over'the adequacy of the blasting plan~~~ <br />due to damage chap has alread.gccurred to our home ~ ~S <br />t c,~ /.v~,,,' ` t <br />7 . we have sera:ous'~ concerns ~ that''E 1F~` lack~b an l// C d/7 <br />adequate plan for the coatrol~o fugitive dus escaping the 3~Yea <br />to be`mi~led, and by reason of t transpor materials from the <br />site by either the new haul road or el Drive. <br />8. expanded quarry operations will presumably result in an <br />increased number oftrucks entering and exiting, and travelling <br />upon, the affected land. ~ <br />9. The public notice and public filings requirements in <br />connection with the permit amendment application may not have <br />been properly and completely followed. In particular, with the <br />additions and revisions to the application being made ae part of <br />the review process we are concerned that the public has had <br />inadequate continuing notice of the application. <br />l0. While we understand that your agency may take the position <br />that the hours and days of operation are beyond the jurisdiction <br />of your agency, we remain very Concerned with this issue, and <br />object to operation of the quarry during unreasonable hours and <br />for seven days a week. <br />In reiteration and/or in addition specific observations noted in <br />Rita Everett~s letter dated November 18, 1996 and the Smiths' <br />letter dated November 22, 1996, the following specific <br />observations are made: <br />i. it is our belief and understanding that the storm water <br />detention ponds that are already supposed to exist on the <br />property as part of the presently permitted quarry operation have <br />never been finally constructed or maintained in compliance with <br />the SwMP ve understand to presently be in effect. <br />