REV96234 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

12/20/1996 15:15 719275 MCDERhA]TT LAW ~ III'IIIIIIIIIIIII III 02 sss j, -?s, .H December 20,`1996 Mr. Thomas A. Schreiner Environmental Protection Specialist Division of Minerals and Geology Department of NaCUral Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 -! Denver, Colorado 80203 ;' ~# Re: T.H.£. Aggregate Source - Amendment Application Permit No. M-77-193 ,~~ =: " ~.. ,~-. .~ Dear Mr. Schreiner. L ~ In response to your December 11, 1996~1etter`t~ta Everett, and similar communication with Philip B. Smith and•~COlita N. Smith, requesting clarification of whether ou7~-'earlier-~correspo:ndence were mergly comments or intended to 'be~foxmalrobjections to granting of the foregoing permit"application, be advised that we are formally objecting to issuance of an amended pernut. ~:~ i •i ,~ ail To clarify, all three of us object to 'the granting of the= application to amend the permit and wish to be formallytreated as "Objectors" as long as the permit amendment applicati~~n i6 pending before your agency. Specific matters we object to, and intended to object to in the Rita Everett letter dated November 18, 1996 and the SmiClz letter dated November~22, 1996, include the following: 1. The storm water management plan (SWMP) that is submitted as part of the application appears to be deficient, or, at least, it is insufficient in content at this point to tell whether or not it is deficient. 2. The proposed haul road plan that ie submitted ae part of the application appears to be deficient, or, at least, it is insufficient in content at this point to tell whether or not it is deficient. 3. We wish it be made clear that the SWMP, as finally clesigned and approved, will be wholly constructed and implemented prior to and as a precondition to commencement of operations in tkie expanded area. .~~au.~ho~( aka (~