Laserfiche WebLink
1 `. <br /> <br />Memo to Cathy Begej - 3 - March 13, 1990 <br />The following comments apply: <br />1. Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division does not have guidelines for <br />overburden suitability determinations at this time. We believe that ESP <br />is a better determination of sodium hazard in materials, such as <br />overburden, that are not presently in equilibrium with their <br />environment. SAR tnen may be a more accurate determination of sodium <br />hazard in materials, such as topsoil, that are more or less in <br />equilibrium with their environment. It is also obvious, from side by <br />side comparison of ESP and SAR values of the samples, that the ESP values <br />were somehow calculated from other numbers than the SAR values. Please <br />provide the raw sodium milliequivalent per 100 grams of soil values that <br />must have been used to calculate the ESP value on the Overburden Analysis <br />Tables so the Division can check their accuracy. These would most likely <br />be from ammonium acetate extraction methods used in the lab. <br />Alternatively, please provide ESP test values run on alternate overburden <br />samples from the Pit 2 area. <br />2. The Division assumes that the units used for the Cation Exchange Capacity <br />(C.E.C.) column were milliequivalents per 100 grams of material. Is this <br />correct? <br />Documentation of Overburden Mixing <br />KCC is probably correct in its assumption that the truck and loader operation <br />they use will suostantially mix the overburden. The report they cite does <br />seen to prove this point with standard deviations of highly variable <br />parameters decreasing substantially with mixing. However, the one thing that <br />the repori did mention is that with organic carbon, mixing made a <br />substantially greater portion of overburden unsuitable as opposed to <br />ameliorating this problem. Thus, ii would seem that the best strategy still <br />is to carefully identify unsuitable overburden material and selectively handle <br />thai material. With this in mind, the following comment applies: <br />1. The Carter Mining Company (CMC) study (Lindsey, 1987) that KCC cites to <br />back up its contention that truck and shovel operations mix overburden <br />has been reviewed by the Division. We agree that substantial mixing of <br />overburden will occur with the mining methods used by KCC. We do not <br />agree that this mixing will necessarily alleviate all the problems <br />identified in the overburden. Review of the CMC study revealed the <br />conclusion that mixing does not always alleviate problems associated with <br />the overburden (see the conclusion that relates to organic carbon). KCC <br />may want to institute a study similar to the CMC one which will <br />demonstrate that the problems identified by more intensive overburden <br />sampling will indeed be eliminated by mixing. <br />In any case, the CMC study conclusions increase the belief of Division <br />personnel that KCC should immediately institute an overburden sampling <br />program in the Pit 1 and 720 Pit areas to ensure that high sodium <br />materials are not placed in the groundwater or plant rooting zones. <br />Please respond to this concern. <br />