My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-05-19_REVISION - M1977342
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977342
>
2003-05-19_REVISION - M1977342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:44:33 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:55:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977342
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/19/2003
Doc Name
Pre-hearing conference memo prepared by Grand County Planning
From
Climax Molybdenum Co
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAY-19-03 11:3TAM FROM-Henderson Mina 2nd Floor <br />303 569 2830 T-OBB P.006/OOB F-OBT <br />pond area to remain inundated at all times; operations <br />costs of water treatment plant; requirement for <br />perpetual operation of water treotment plant; dust <br />suppression post-closure; maintenance of spillway post- <br />closure. The company under a wet cover or dry cover <br />scenario will have to maintain a state discharge permit, <br />which may also hove the force that requires the <br />Company to operate and maintain the water treatment <br />plant in order to comply with their discharge permit. <br />Issues would also be addressed in any 1041 Permit. The <br />County's comments are also in agreement with the <br />Division of Minerals and Geology. <br />~ Considerption of o wet cover plan will be through the <br />permit amendment process including public notice and <br />the opportunity to provide comments. <br />Technical Revision TR-12 <br />0 The Company agreed to comply with all »ecessury permitting <br />applicable [o landfills anti process []te currcntl~ proposed Technical <br />Revision as a Permit Antcndmcttt for the ttcrv 7.5 acre landfill. The <br />new landfill does require Certificate of Desiattation by Grand <br />County and at[ approved special use permit. At the time the new <br />landfill Amendment is to be considered the Company will provide a <br />feasibility study, which addresses the water quality, structural, <br />operational and financial issues, design and ens veering, a geo- <br />technical analysis and other support documc»[ation (i.e., a 30 year <br />post closure plan), It is proposed that the existing .17 acre landfill <br />continue to be utilized as part of reclamation. Grand County, nor the <br />State of Colorado have record that this landfill is in substantive <br />compliance with public hcaltlt and environmental rebulations. It <br />must be required of the Cumpany that [hey provide the State of <br />Colorado stud Grand County with evidence that the .17 acre landfill <br />is in substantive compliance as rcgttircd. <br />. County maintains same comments as stated above. The <br />County emphasizes the any new landfill or existing <br />landfill that expands requires compliance with the <br />Certificate of Designation standards as stipulated by the <br />Memorandum of Understanding between Division of <br />Minerals and Geology and the CDPHE and o Special Use <br />Permit from Grand County. The Mined Land Reclamation <br />Act does not exclude mines from zoning and lond use <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.