Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />Permit Revision No. 5 - PAR 2 <br />July 5, 1999 <br />Page 4 <br />therefore, it is reasonable to require that current permit <br />information be up-to-date with regard to mine inflows. <br />Climate (2.04.8) <br />1. No further response is required. <br />Soils (2.04.9) <br />1. No further response is required. <br />Vegetation (2.04.10) <br />1. No further response is required. <br />Fish and Wildlife (2.04.11) <br /> <br />1. No further response is required. <br />2. No further response is required. <br />3. No further response is required, as MCC has committed to <br /> pay ing the Windy Gap fee. <br />4. The Division maintains that the information regarding rare and <br />endangered species that was deleted should be included in the <br />permit as it relates to studies done for the current permit <br />area. The Environmental Assessment prepared by the BLM is <br />only for the Jumbo Mountain lease tract and does not include <br />the entire permit area. MCC should revise the appropriate <br />pages. <br />Prime Farmland Investigation (2.04.121 <br />1. No further response is required. <br />Operation Plan (2.05.2) <br />1. The Division would recommend that the pre-existing roads that <br />will be utilized for monitoring also be incorporated onto Map <br />34A. Given the history at the West Elk Mine regarding light- <br />use roads, it should be clear what roads will be used for what <br />