Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Permit Revision No. 5 - PAR 2 <br />July 5, 1994 <br />Page 3 <br />7. As the Wilcox Ditch will not provide MCC with useful data, the <br />Division will not require MCC to include it in the monitoring <br />program. However, is the Wilcox Ditch currently being used or <br />is intended to be used by the land owner? The Jumbo Spring <br />and Pipeline has been added to the monitoring program. <br />8. The three reservoirs identified on Maps 34A and 37A does not <br />neZZd to be included in the discussion of the other reservoirs <br />within MCC's life-of-mine area, as previously requested by the <br />Division, due the size of the structures. <br />9. Please refer to #1 above. <br />10. Exhibit 19B does not include the water right holder, source, <br />beneficial use, or historical flow. MCC should modify this <br />exhibit to include the missing information. <br />11. The Division has reviewed the data collected to date for the <br />surface water sites. No data was included for resource #7 <br />(Section 24 Spring No. 6 Pond) and only two months of data has <br />been collected for resource #6 (Wilcox Reservoir). Please <br />explain. Flow measurements, as requested by the Division, has <br />been included in the field notes provided to the Division. <br />12. The Division has noted that pH and conductivity has been <br />included in the field notes provided with MCC's response. MCC <br />should continue to follow the guidelines for collection of <br />baseline water quality. MCC is correct in assuming the <br />parameters in the regulations are more appropriate for <br />streams. Springs fall into a gray area as to whether they <br />should be considered surface water or ground water. Since <br />these springs are naturally occurring, acidity and dissolved <br />iron should not be a concern. <br />13. The Division has reviewed revised page 2.04-76 and finds it <br />acceptable. No further response is required. <br />14. The Raymond Wilcox Reservoir No. 2 and Jumbo Spring No. 7 Pond <br />has been included in the monitoring. No further response is <br />necessary. <br />15. Please explain what is meant by "MCC will repair a source of <br />water with a legitimate use and/or will otherwise be <br />responsible for damage as required by law" on page 2.04-81. <br />16. The Division believes it to be appropriate to update mine <br />inflow tables in this permit revision. MCC indicates that no <br />major change in mine inflows is expected in Jumbo Mountain; <br />