My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV95898
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV95898
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:20:46 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:53:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1985043
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/11/2001
Doc Name
LATE COPY OF AN OBJECTION TO THE AMENDMENT APPLICATION RED CANYON QUARRY M-85-043
From
DMG
To
RED CANYON LLC
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Vav9Gtctvt ~l~ofo9ra~Giy <br />a vutru.~nG PvFS~'-u~w <br />Stephen Vaughan <br />13120 Crump Road <br />Colorado Springs, CO 80908 <br />(719)495-2936 <br />James Dillie <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Dillie, <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br />APR 1 0 2001 <br />Apri19, 2001 <br />L1iviSian of Minerals and Geology <br />As you directed in the Informal Conference on Mazch 29, 2001, I am writing to fully <br />clarify our objections to the proposed Amendment to the Red Canyon Quarry, M-85-043: <br />I wish to be included in the objectors who feel that the extension of the quarry will result <br />in a taking of a species protected.under the Endangered Species Act. (Item 1 0^ your list <br />of objections). <br />I wish to clarify that I object to the noise and site impacts of the mine expansion on the <br />grounds that I feel that this will lead to a taking of a species protected under the <br />Endangered Species Ac4 (amending.item 5 on your list). This would. cover our objecting <br />to night activities such as blasting, and the presence bf lights visible to the owls at night. <br />I also wish to object on the basis that we believe-that the "taking" of a breeding pair of <br />owls will actually zesult in the taking of a number of birds; their projected offspring over <br />the life of the breeding pair; possibly over 20 years (Johnson and Reynolds) At a rate of <br />production: of between 1.36 and 1.67 fledglings per nesting attempt (Johnson and <br />Reynolds), this could add up to a total bf between 20 and 25 other birds. This pair appear <br />to be the most successful known breeding patr in the state of Colorado, so this is a <br />significant number of birds. . <br />I wish to object on the grounds that we believe that the reclaimation will be creating <br />habitat for Great Horned Owls, a predator on the Mexican Spotted Owl (US Fish and <br />Wildlife Service letter to CDMG dated Mazch 19, 2001). <br />I object on the grounds that we believe that the proposed construction of fire roads near <br />the owl habitat area will disturb them unnecessarily. <br />I object on the grounds that we believe a thorough monitoring study needs to be done to <br />determine if the anecdotal material suggesting that the owls are steadily moving up and <br />away from the quarrying activity is indeed indeed valid. <br /> <br />I / I)1 $0 Cruur Ro+o. Buct Fo+[tr CO 80908 <br />n9 x95.1918 / v+ucn+. rnaro0rc~ta.cou <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.