Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• 11. Response accepted. <br />16. Response accepted. <br />17. Response accepted. <br />18. The ditch summary table (Primero Fill Areas) still shows concrete for the ditch lining <br />material. Please change the table to "riprap" for ditch west S-6 for fill2-Yand re-submit. <br />19. Designs were reviewed for four different sections of the "un-named ditch". Please <br />delineate on the surface water management plan map the location of each section. Use <br />a naming convention that clearly identifies the design associated with each discrete ditch <br />section. Considering the large increase in estimated flow, please demonstrate that the <br />culvert below this ditch can handle the increased flow or submit new designs for a larger <br />culvert at this location along the Lorencito Canyon road. <br />20. Response accepted. <br />21. Response accepted. <br />22. D6-1 a is included in the ditch summary table. Is this the same ditch as the one labeled <br />D6-1 on Map/Figure EX 15-15? <br />28. The ditch remains on Map/Figure EX 15-15. Please remove the ditch from the <br />• Map/Figure EX 15-15. <br />28.5 All responses accepted. <br />Rule 2.05.3(51 Operation Plan - Toasoil <br />30. If not already done, please incorporate the erosion control methods stated in your <br />answer into the permit application text. <br />Rule 2.05.3(6) Operation Plan -Overburden <br />31. Response accepted. <br />31 a. Response accepted. <br />32. The Division awaits submittal of Figure 1 of Exhibit 13 (CTL Thomson Report) under <br />separate cover. <br />34. The Division awaits submittal of the revised page under separate cover. <br />37. Response accepted. <br />Rule 2.05.4 Reclamation Plan <br />• 40. Reclamation cost estimate information is forthcoming following our meeting of 9/7/2001. <br />