My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV95890
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV95890
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:20:46 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:53:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/7/2001
Doc Name
PR-1 LORENCITO CANYON MINE PN C-1996-084 REVIEW OF RESPONSES ADEQUACY REVIEW 2 MINE PLAN
To
GREYSTONE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS INC
Type & Sequence
PR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • <br />• <br />September 7, 2001 <br />Mike Kolin <br />Greystone Development Consultants, Inc. <br />5231 South Quebec Street <br />Englewood, CO 80111 <br />~, <br />J <br /> <br />RE: Permit Revision No.1 (PR-01) <br />Lorencito Canyon Mine, #C-96-084 <br />Review of Responses, Adequacy Review # 2, Mine Plan Modification <br />Dear Mr. Kolin: <br />The Division of Minerals and Geology has completed review of the second set of adequacy <br />responses to our adequacy letter of August 21, 2001 for Permit Revision #1 (PR-01 ), Mine Plan <br />Modification for the Lorencito Canyon Mine. Questions that have been resolved previous to this <br />review have been removed. <br />For any new or revised information re-submitted as a result of this adequacy review, please <br />• submit three copies to the Division. This new or revised information is also required to be <br />available for public review in the vicinity of the mine site at the same time it is submitted to the <br />Division. Please ensure a copy of all review materials and letters are available at the Las <br />Animas County Courthouse. <br />Rule 2.04.4 Cultural and Historic Resource Information <br />Response accepted. Materials were forwarded to the SHPO on August 14, 2001. Final <br />SHPO comments for sites 5LA9571, 5LA9572, 5LA9577, and 5LA9578 are forthcoming <br />shortly. <br />5a. See response to #4. <br />Rule 2.04.6(21 Geology Description <br />6. The Division has no questions concerning the results of overburden sampling or geology <br />in general. <br />Rule 2.05.3(2) Operation Plan Description <br />6a. Response accepted <br />7. As a result of our meeting on 9/7/2001, the Division anticipates road information to be <br />submitted in the near future. See the roads section below. <br />• Rule 2.05.3(4) Operation Plan -Ponds and Impoundments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.