My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV95742
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV95742
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:20:40 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:51:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/17/1993
Doc Name
MINES 1 2 & ECKMAN PARK FN C-81-071 PHASE II & III BOND RELEASE BLOCK A
From
DMG
To
CYPRUS YAMPA VALLEY COAL CO
Type & Sequence
SL1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~. <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman SI., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone: 1303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (30A 832-8106 <br />September 17, 1993 <br />Mr. Marcus Middleton <br />Cyprus Yampa Valley Coal Corporation <br />29587 Routt County Road No. 27 <br />Oak Creek, CO 80467 <br />Re: (dines 1, 2 and Eckman Park, File No. C-81-071 <br />Phase II and III Bond Release, Block A <br />Dear Mr. Middleton: <br />of eon <br />rte / cb <br />O <br />~~4• <br />•~ k <br />~ r8 ]6 ~ <br />Roy Ramer <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />The Division has completed review of the vegetation data and sampling results <br />for Block A, Phase II and III bond release application for tdine 2, Permit <br />No. C-81-071. Adequacy issues were summarized in the Division's inspection <br />report dated August 19, 1993, This letter expands on Items 1 and 6 of that <br />report. <br />Vegetation Data Review <br />Please provide a complete discussion of the methodology utilized in <br />sample allocation for Block A vegetation sampling. <br />Please provide a thorough explanation of all statistical calculations <br />(i.e., what data sets were used for calculations of means and standard <br />deviations and what formula was used to determine sample adequacy). <br />The Division has reviewed the 1990 Sampling field sheets and agrees that <br />reclaimed area sampling events did occur proportionately with the two <br />reference area sampling events (June and July). Therefore, averaging the June <br />and July reference area sampling event means to obtain one cover standard <br />value and one production standard value for 1990 re vegetation success <br />evaluation is acceptable. <br />Additional clarification or revision to the application package is necessary <br />for proper evaluation. Please address the following concerns: <br />In your presentation of field sampling data, please include all species <br />(annual, biennial and perennial) and the percentages of the vegetative <br />community each species occupies. Additionally, please present the "hits" <br />and percentages of rock and bare ground cover encountered during <br />sampling, as well as the litter component. <br />Please differentiate between the noxious and non-noxious components of <br />the undesirable (weedy) species occurring on the bond release application <br />area and calculate their respective cover and production percentages <br />separately. <br />• <br />• III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.