My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV95401
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV95401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:20:27 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:49:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/14/2004
Doc Name
3rd Adequacy Review Letter
From
DMG
To
Seneca Coal Company
Type & Sequence
TR25
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Roy Kazo <br />Seneca Coal Company <br />7/14/2004 <br />Page 2 <br />id. Response accepted. <br />le. The Division is currently reviewing the bond liability estimate and will forwazd <br />any revised cost summary sheets to SCC. As indicated in your response, SCC <br />will update Attachment 25-1 accordingly. <br />1 £ Response accepted. <br />lg. Response accepted. <br />1 h. There are still several inconsistencies on the revised pages of Tab 19. The <br />information at the bottom of page 5, Tab 19 is repeated again on page 6. The <br />following sentence is missing from the approved text between pages 6 and 7: <br />"All of the acres graded in a given yeaz aze projected to be topsoiled and seeded <br />as soon as possible based on the reclamation timetable, and will represent <br />reclaimed acres in Table 19-1. Soil replacement will be completed within one <br />year following final grading, provided the azea is"... Please add this language <br />back into the text between revised pages 6 and 7. <br />To be consistent with the backfill and grading plan as depicted on revised Exhibit <br />19-1A and to ensure compliance with Rules 4.13 and 4.14(1)(c), the Division <br />recommends rewriting the last two sentences of the first pazagraph on revised <br />page 5 as follows: <br />"The completion of backfilling and grading at select locations along final pit <br />highwalls may require additional time beyond 180 days due to these areas being <br />scheduled for future highwall mining." <br />The Division also recommends the following changes to page 6 of Tab 19: <br />Please remove the third sentence of the last pazagraph on revised page 6. The <br />Division cannot approve more than four spoil ridges. Please also revise the <br />second to last sentence of the same paragraph to read as follows: <br />"For example, the backfilling and grading of box cut spoil, final highwalls, and <br />deep ramps typically require the movement of large volumes of spoil for great <br />distances and may require additional time for final grading after rough backfill <br />and grading has been achieved." <br />Finally, the Division recommends that the second sentence of the third paragraph <br />of page 12-2-3 of Attachment 12-2 be revised as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.