REV95396 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Larry Oehler May 23, 1990 Page 2 Exhibit D - Mining Plan General 1. Reclamation Resources recognizes the Division's disagrees with the Division's analysis. In 1985 Reclamation Resources permitted 160 acres of lands". The statute at 34-32-112 requires accurately depict the affected acreage. The 1! inaccurately depicts only 140 acres. To correct compliant maps, as a part of the Technical Reclamation Resources has submitted correct, act which depict the full 160 permitted acres. The new, accurate maps include an impoundment whit facility dating back to the late 1930's. This facility is highly disturbed, is located entirely legal description found in Exhibit A and does eliminate adjoining property owners as it is li distance from the edge of the Ducommun property. regulations encouraged the permitting to allow for in operations: To avoid the necessity of frequent technical revisions operations are encouraged in the submission of their application, to allow flexibility in the methodology of the mining operation . Section 1.9, Technical Revision, C.R.S. 34-32-101 April, 1984. In 1988, the Colorado Legislature went one step fi changed the statutory language. As the result, for time changes in mining operation no longer requires amendment at all. In 1985 the Panhandle Drilling Company paid the aF fees to permit 160 acres. The 160 acres was in provide the recommended flexibility in mining oper jurisdiction which the Colorado Legislature ultimate to remove entirely from the MLRD. The 160 z inaccurately drawn to exclude an extremely disturbed, site facility essential to providing operational fle In fact, the inaccuracies in the maps resulte~ representation of only 140 acres. For these reason but "affected hat maps a5 permit the non- Revision -ate maps is a site ithin the .t add or ited some The 1985 exibility amended, rther and the first a permit lication ended to tions, a saw fit :res was historic ibility. in the the