REV94988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

January 24, 1980 Mr. Robert G. Biglow P.O. Box 1037 Salida, Colorado fl1201 ' RE: Ll, S. Soil Conditioning/J. F1. Lionelle Our File No. 79-206 Dear 14r. Biglow: III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII This letter has two purposes. First, I wish to respond to the supplementary adequacy materials submitted to this office on January 8th concerning the mining and reclamation permit for the above captioned operation. Second, I wish to clarify the actions taken by the Mined Land Reclamation Board in relation to this operation and discuss our conclusions concerning the bonatng of the operation. I might and that the Colorado Divisi:n of (dater Resources has no ob4ections to the mining operation itself. Rowever, I am submitting a copy of your supplementary materials to them today in anticipation of their comments (especially, I would assume, on Exhibit G-1). My comments on the supplementary materials follow on an exhibit-by-exhibit basis. Exhibit C: 1. As we discussed yesterday, I am assuming that you will add the approximately 2 acres encompassing the 800-foot abortive haul road to the south~gf the present mining affected acreage as new affected acreage. This will add to the fee to be pGid slightly, and I will thus expect a check from you in the proper amount. The mining plan and reclamation plan maps should also be altered accordingly. If necessary, this change should be reflected ~.ti~ any Future publication. Exhibits A-1 and C-1: r 1. Referencing map C-1, there appears to be acreage that is not included ,in the legal description given ;n ~chibit A-1. These areas are a&as follow®'~ a.) Acreage to ~hBLMaacreageto4the westiof Lod 4windSections181 SThese Company; and ~7 two tracts are affected land not described to the nearest quarter quart:e.r section, and noQp;oof of legal right to enter has been provided for them, The description P proof is needed for these two exhibits to be adequate. This change should also be reflected in future publications.