My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV94951
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV94951
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:20:10 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:44:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
CHECKLIST FOR SEDIMENTATION POND AS-BUILTS
Type & Sequence
TR90
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 ` /~ III IIIIIIIIilllllll <br />~ / ~-~ ~ 999 <br />CHECKLIST FOR SEDIMENTATION POND AS-BUILTS <br />v~ <br />C <br />This is a checklist of required and preferred items to be on a sedimentation pond as-built. <br />Technically, an as-built is a representation of all physical features of the structure. Horizontal <br />features of size and configuration (including contour lines) are shown on a plan view. Vertical <br />aspects are often, and better, shown on cross-sections or profi]e drawings. Text specifications <br />often appear on an as-built. Operational features of a pond are required to demonstrate <br />compliance with the Rules, and these items are best illustrated (operational design requirements) <br />on an as-built drawing. As-builts should confirm that a structure is built according to an <br />approved design. Designs are based on studies, investigations, and demonstrations, and need to <br />demonstrate general compliance with Rule 2.05.6(3). Required design aspects that do not appear <br />on an as-built need [o be presented elsewhere in the Permit. Inclusion on the as-built often <br />eliminates duplication of inforniation in the Permit by presentation of design, as well as as-built, <br />features on a single drawing. As a matter of practicality, as-built drawings are frequently <br />annotated design drawings. <br />Pond # MB 4 ,Permit C-_80_-_007_, date:_~ Feb 1999 <br />ITEM REFERENCE PURPOSE COMPLIANCE? <br />Certification by a 2.05.3(4)(ii)(A) Rule requirement, NO. A surveyors stamp is <br />registered July 13, 1984 Division definition of on the drawing. The PE <br />professional engineer letter. adequacy certification is inadequate. <br />A plan view, showing 4.05.6(3)(a) A basic element of an YES <br />shape and size as-built. <br /> Demonstrates capacity <br />Location of primary 4.05.6(3)(a) A basic element of an YES <br />spillway as-built. <br /> Demonstrates <br /> configuration. <br />Location of 4.05.6(3)(a) A basic element of an YES <br />emergency spillway as-built. <br /> Demonstrates <br /> configuration. <br />Nonclogging 4.05.6(3)(c) Prevents clogging of NO. A controversial item <br />dewatering device the primary spillway of the rule. The "or" of the <br /> by debris. rules cou]d be interpreted <br /> that such devices are not <br /> required on conduit <br /> spillways. In any event, use <br /> is a good engineering <br /> practice. <br />Invert elevation of the 4.05.6(3)(c) Required [o determine DISCREPENCY. The <br />dewatering device. that the invert elevation is indicated as <br /> elevation is not 6079.8 on the plan view, <br /> located at a lower and 6079.55 on Figure 4. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.