Laserfiche WebLink
.. .. , . <br />crops, stock watering for beef and dairy cattle and the watering of home <br />gardens. <br />The rights associated with the Standley Lake Division include: <br />1. Croke Canal Priority date March 4, ]902, decreed March 14, <br />1936, for 944 C.F.S. <br />2. Standley Reservoir. Priority date March 45, 1902, decreed <br />March 14, 1936, for 32,361 acre-feet, absolute and 16,699 acre-feet, <br />conditional. Both the Croke Canal and Standley Reservoir are decreed for <br />irrigation and domestic uses; however, there has been no substantial historic in- <br />house domestic use prior to acquisition of shares by Westminster and Thornton. <br />3. Church Ditch. FRICO is also an owner of rights to purchase <br />water from the Church Ditch. <br />9. Thornton-and Westminster are shareholders of FRICO and also <br />separately own independent rights to store water in Standley Reservoir. Thornton <br />and Westminster presently provide water service to about 135,000 people. About <br />95 percert of Westminster's water supply and about 75 percent of Thornton's are <br />scored in Standley Reservoir. Hoth cities store water diverted under FRICO's <br />decrees and the other rights identified above. Both cities have used water from <br />. these sources since the early 1950's. Thornton's rights have not been the subject <br />of any application to change their use to municipal use. Westminster obtained <br />judicial confirmation of its right to store in Standley Reservoir and use for <br />municipal purposes certain rights, including that part of its Farmers High Line and <br />Church Ditch rights which it owned in 1977, in Case No. W-8743 and its Coel <br />Creek rights. No objector has filed for or obtained a decree changing any part of <br />the Croke Canal or Standley Reservoir rights (referred to in paragraph 8(c)(1)dc(2) <br />above) to municipal use. <br />10. The Croke Canal diverts primarily, but not exclusively, during the <br />winter. At that time it generally diverts all the water available in Clear Creek at <br />its headgate. <br />11. Prior to 1952, Golden had no central sewage treatment. From 1952- <br />1972, Golden's sewage was treated and discharged at the GWTP above the Croke <br />Canal, along with ell of Coors' wastewater. From 1972-1982 Golden's sewage and <br />Coors' industrial sewage were treated at the Denver Metro sewage treatment <br />plant and discharged to the South Platte River. Since August, 1982, the GWTP has <br />again been used to treat Golden's sewage and Coors' industrial sewage. <br />12. ~O~dlvert 20 c.fs. out-of-priority, as proposed, Golden must replace <br />chat.. 20 c.f.s.._ to the stream above the point of diversion of the water right that <br />would:otherwiae have received that water. Throughout the winter and also at <br />other times, the affected water rights are those of the Croke Canal and Standley <br />Reservofr. <br />• 13. Golden's plan would increase the amount of Golden's sewage diverted <br />-3- <br />