Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION <br /> The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in its report to Congress (March, <br /> 1999) noted that the use of coal combustion products (CCPs) in mine applications represented a <br /> beneficial reuse option, but information is needed on the environmental impact of these reuse <br /> options before it could make its regulatory determination. It is a well-known fact that CCPs have <br /> been used extensively in mining applications for a number of years (see Reference Section). In <br /> surface mining the ash has been used in producing stable fill areas, in haul road construction, and <br /> in reclamation. Certain of the ashes have sufficient neutralization potential to make them useful <br /> for acid mine drainage abatement. The CCPs have also been used in underground mines for a <br /> number of applications, such as bulkhead construction, acid mine drainage abatement, and <br /> subsidence control. <br /> The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sponsored three major mining-related projects at <br /> West Virginia University, Southern Illinois University and the University of Kentucky (Black and <br /> Ziemkiewicz, 1998; Chugh and others, 1998; and Rob] and others, 1998, 1999). These projects <br /> addressed the use of CCPs in underground mining operations. Although the mine conditions were <br /> variable from dry mines to partially flooded mines, the demonstrations did not adequately define <br /> the environmental impact of CCP use in these applications. In fact, the environmental benefit in <br /> terms of acid mine drainage abatement through the use of CCPs has not been convincingly <br /> demonstrated. The problem does not appear to be with the ash used to produce the grout, but <br /> instead in the injection system and the ability to control grout flow and completeness of mine void <br /> filling. It appears in the cases cited by Kim (1998, 1999) that the acid waters continue to bypass <br /> the grout system. The majority of the mine injection projects involve the abatement of the acid <br /> mine drainage. In the western U.S., the coals are the major aquifers for local water supply. <br /> Information on those flooded mine applications involving the interaction of the grout materials <br /> with the groundwater system is very limited. <br /> In fact, the injection of grouts into underground voids is not allowed in all states. <br /> Wyoming and North Dakota have programs that allow for the use of ash-based grouts <br /> underground. Unfortunately, Colorado does not have such a program. As a result, ash-based <br /> grout injection activities in Colorado and numerous other states require considerable <br /> documentation and data on environmental impacts prior to being issued a permit. This situation is <br /> even further complicated when the mine is fully flooded and sits in the regional groundwater <br /> aquifer. Such is the case of the Shamrock Mine in Weld County, Colorado. <br /> The Shamrock Mine is an abandoned underground mine that lies in the groundwater <br /> aquifer and is flooded. The mine is a room and pillar operation with approximately 10-foot seam <br /> height and the mine is approximately 100 feet below the surface and subsidence is a concern. A <br /> grout injection system is being proposed for the Shamrock Mine that would be composed of ashes <br /> from Public Service Co. (PSCo) of Colorado facilities and Shamrock Mine water. The proposed <br /> grout injection system will involve pumping the grout into the mine on 25-foot spacing. The <br /> displaced mine water would be used in the grout production and/or used for surface needs. <br /> 1 <br />