My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV93652
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV93652
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:14:59 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:33:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999021
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/17/2000
Doc Name
TECHNICAL ADEQUACY REVIEW FOR TR TO A 112 PERMIT NO M-1999-021 STEGNER FARMS PIT
From
DMG
To
CAMAS COLO INC
Type & Sequence
TR3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~,1 <br />ST~T~ ~e~ <br />OF <br />COLOiZADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOIOGr <br />Druanmrm of Natural Rrsuurcts <br />I{ l i 5hcrm, n $1.. Room '_ 1 5 <br />Ormrr. Colvradn BO'_0] D I ~~ S I O ~ O F <br />Phnnr'~,0ll ann~;,r.r M I N E RA l5 <br /> <br /> MEMIO GEOLOGI' <br /> 0. E C l f H A C I O N <br />MIN IN(, •$RFE" <br /> MINERALS PROGRAM POLICY <br /> Bdl O..en. <br /> Co.rmn• <br />T0: Minerals Staff r,,re E. ,,.~„1,~•• <br /> E,rcmirr D~rr<wr <br />FROM• HBH ~,4'~r18 Lnn. <br />DATE: March 29, 2000 <br />RE: Policy On Application Reviews Invo{ving Lined Sand and Gravel Pits <br />The Division has received comments from applicants and their consultants concerning Division <br />request fot design information related to lined sand attd ,avel pits. These comments questioned <br />the need for such information, as well as the Division's technical ability to review it. <br />It is cleaz that the Division has a need for such design information in order to calculate an <br />appropriate reclamation bond. It is also cleaz that the Division has the technical expertise <br />necessary to review the engineering evaluations and c.esigns. However, it is correct that the <br />actual authority to review and approve such designs r.;su with the Office of the State Engineer <br />(SEO). This review and approval authority is cleazly stated in their "Proposed Guidelines for <br />Lining Criteria For Gravel Pits"(8116/99), and verified through conversations with personnel in <br />the Office of the State Engineer. , <br />Therefore, the Minerals Program will no longer approve engineering designs For installing liners <br />that aze intended to meet SEO water rights protection criteria. An applicant, however, shall be <br />required to provide DMG any of the following in order to demonsuate compliance with Section <br />3.1.6 of the Construction Material Rules: <br />• A copy of the SEO's letter approving the proposec liner design and a copy of the design and <br />specifications for inclusion in[o the applicant s application prior to the Division's approval or <br />recommendation date, or <br />• A commitment to stay at least two feet above the historic highest ,ound water level together <br />with an adequate means to monitor compliance, or <br />• A bond adequate to backfill the pit to two feet above the historic highest ground water <br />elevation, or <br />• A letter from the SEO stating that the applicant ha> satisfied the SEO requirements for an <br />augmentation plan or substitute supply plan for grl>und water exposed to evaporative loss and <br />lhas an associated well permit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.