My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV93429
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV93429
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:14:46 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:31:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/16/2003
Doc Name
Adequacy Response & Request for Meeting
From
Blue Mountain Energy Inc
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
PR4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
First, the double or "H" pole line servicing the mine will remain following reclamation <br />per Section IV.E of the permit application. <br />What was the general magnitude of the Hawk's Nest Mine power line removal project? <br />If it was a small project it may explain the high unit costs for removal. Also, were the <br />escalators found on the "Cost Summary Form -Indirect Costs" properly backed out of <br />the bid price for calculation purposes? <br />What is referred to as the "lazger structural steel box frame unit"? If this refers to power <br />line support structures it doesn't have any applicability to the Deserado Mine even <br />though "Engineers for the Deserado Mine" were referenced as the source of DMG's <br />information. There are no such structures currently on the mine site and such <br />information, regardless or its origin is not applicable to this site. <br />d. Conveyor Demolition <br />Thank you for identifying the data source. While the unit costs seem within reason we <br />need to be sure that the escalators found on the "Cost Summary Form -Indirect Costs" <br />properly backed out of the bid price for calculation purposes. Please confirm that proper <br />adjustments were made to the data to back out the cost escalators. <br />e. Culvert Removal Costs <br />DMG's response was "See attached Unit Cost Menu and associated Unit Cost <br />Calculation Table-Pipe demolition costs." However, the referenced material was not <br />attached to the response. Please provide this information to help cleaz up questions <br />concerning cost estimates for culvert removal. <br />As stated, the unit costs include many tasks already undertaken by or irrelevant to <br />removal during reclamation. Please modify these costs to cover only the culvert <br />extraction and demolition as these are the only items not already covered by the <br />earthwork activity. <br />12. Revegetation Costs <br />Due to the outdated cost data presented by DMG we conducted a contractor survey to <br />accurately assess representative costs for revegetation tasks. Seven contractors <br />experienced in large scale reclamation projects were contacted and asked to provide <br />representative estimates of unit costs for total site reclamation of the Deserado Mine. All <br />seven provided this information. The data and summary of this information are attached. <br />Five of the seven presented what we would consider representative bids. The other two <br />provided grossly high bids indicating excessive greed and should not be considered. <br />Such high bids should be quickly weeded out, either through competitive bidding or by <br />being pulled from the initial prospective bid list. <br />January I5, 2003 8 Permit Revision #4 Comments <br />Blue Mountain Energy, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.