My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV93429
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV93429
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:14:46 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:31:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/16/2003
Doc Name
Adequacy Response & Request for Meeting
From
Blue Mountain Energy Inc
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
PR4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DMG explains the added need for the motor grader for minor grading of the backfilled <br />areas. While this is a reasonable use of the equipment such use would still fall well <br />within the 25% use currently assessed for the grader. Very little time is needed for road <br />maintenance by a grader for jobs performed by scrapers. We were assuming that the bulk <br />of the 25% utilization would be applied to the minor regrading function and not road <br />maintenance. <br />BME maintains the position the DMG should modify the CIRCES program to allow one <br />operator to operate several pieces of equipment up to a maximum of 100% utilization. <br />We recognize that such changes will probably not be completed for this round of cost <br />estimation. However, it should be completed by the next software update. BME brought <br />up this shortfall in the software during the last midterm review and nothing has been done <br />to address this issue. <br />l0. Dozer Push Gradients (sediment pond reclamation) <br />When regrading an embankment on relatively flat ground material is not pushed `5rp and <br />over" the embankment. Material is first removed from the top of the embankment and <br />pushed down onto the sides of the pond area. There is no case where material would <br />need to be pushed "up and over" an embankment since the top of the embankment needs <br />to be moved to complete the project. The drainages where the dams are constructed have <br />a very low gradient, only 1 or 2%. As such, only a very small portion of the material at <br />the very lower toe of the fill would have to be pushed up. The bulk would actually be <br />pushed down into the reservoir. Thus, our request to use a "0%" push gradient instead of <br />a 5% uphill gradient is reasonable. <br />11. Demolition Costs <br />a. Concrete Demolition <br />DMG's response was "See attached Unit Cost Menu and associated Unit Cost <br />Calculation Table-Concrete building, concrete floor demolition, concrete wall <br />demolition, and RCP (reinforced concrete pipe) demolition." However, the referenced <br />material was not attached to the response. Please provide this information to help clear <br />up questions conceming cost estimates for concrete demolition. <br />b. Footing Demolition <br />DMG's response was "See attached Unit Cost Menu and associated Unit Cost <br />Calculation Table-Concrete footer demolition." However, the referenced material was not <br />attached to the response. Please provide this information to help clear up questions <br />concerning cost estimates for concrete footer demolition. <br />c. Power Line Removal <br />January 15, 2003 7 Permit Revision #4 Comments <br />Blue Mountain Energy, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.