My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV93082
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV93082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:14:26 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:27:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/24/1984
Doc Name
Wildlife Mitigation Study
From
Colorado Yampa Coal
To
Fish and Wildlife Service
Type & Sequence
PR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />C: <br />4. Leaving four undisturbed islands of aspen (108.2 acres), and mountain <br />shrub vegetation (47.6 acres); <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />Live.liandled topsoiling to promote reestablishment of native <br />vegetation; <br />Implementation of the site specific raptor surveys. <br />Offsite habitat enhancement. <br />8. Implementation of other actions during the permit application process <br />and afterward to address previously unidentified species and habitat <br />for which data is not available. <br />The CDOW and USFWS proposed other ideas regarding mitigation, but we have <br />teen unable to make a decision on any of them due to the lack of information <br />provided to us as to what specific species and habitat values are to be <br />addressed. Your September 11, 1984 letter acknowledges that we have repeatedly <br />requested recommendations on mitigation only to be informed that you "do not <br />believe that mitigation strategies can be realistically formulated without <br />i~urther evaluation of local habitat importance and specific mine development <br />plans." We have previously provided the responsible agencies with all of our <br />existing baseline data and proposed operational plans. We do not fully <br />understand what additional information USFWS deems necessary in order to <br />i~ormulate acceptable mitigation strategies. In the absence of such <br />recommendations, we will propose and request approval of measures which we feel <br />will address your concerns. <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.